Hi All,
Is there way to do something like this from the admin socket:
acl bad_ip src 184.66.248.33
tcp-request connection reject if bad_ip
Thanks!
Alex
Hi All,
I'm seeing the 'status code' as -1 in haproxy logs, whereas the
documentation specifies:
"The status code is always 3-digit."
I do see the 'normal' result codes, but I also see a lot of -1's.
Any idea what causes this?
-Alex
Systems Architect
SFG Media Group, LLC
in this situation.
Regards,
Vivek
On Jan 14, 2015 11:45 PM, Alexey Zilber alexeyzil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We got hit with a bit of traffic and we saw haproxy dump most of the
traffic to 3-4 app servers, sometimes even just one and driving load on
there to 90. We were running
Hi All,
We got hit with a bit of traffic and we saw haproxy dump most of the
traffic to 3-4 app servers, sometimes even just one and driving load on
there to 90. We were running 1.5.9, I upgraded to 1.5.10 and the same
problem remained. Currently traffic is low so everything is load balanced
and not 2000.
-Bryan
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Alexey Zilber alexeyzil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Willy and Lukas,
Here's snippets of the new config:
-
global
maxconn 645000
maxpipes 645000
ulimit-n 645120
user haproxy
%
-
Thanks!
-Alex
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:57:50PM +0800, Alexey Zilber wrote:
Hi Willy,
I already do option dontlognull. These get logged anyway. We've
actually seen a high amount of 400 errors happening
Hi Willy,
I already do option dontlognull. These get logged anyway. We've
actually seen a high amount of 400 errors happening. I'll post the configs
in a day or two (the pre/post) configs. I've been able to knock down the
400 and 502 errors to about 10%, with 400 errors being around .6% of
On Nov 22, 2014 1:06 PM, Alexey Zilber alexeyzil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm running v1.5.4 and I'm seeing a large amount of 400 BADREQ erros:
Nov 21 22:46:06 srvr1 haproxy[28293]: 10.10.10.10:51184
[21/Nov/2014:22:45:50.323] www www/NOSRV -1/-1/-1/-1/16350 400 187 - -
PRNN 445/445/0/0/3
Hi Lukas,
I had decoded the error message and it didn't make sense. There is no
connection limit reached, there are no filters. If you look at the rest of
the log line, there were no cookies. In fact, the last part a security
check which detected and blocked a dangerous error in server
Hi Willy,
Any ETA for the next release that incorporates this bugfix, or should I
build from current source?
Thanks!
Alex
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Godbach!
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:02:52AM +0800, Godbach wrote:
Hi Willy,
On 2014/11/19
Hi All,
I'm running v1.5.4 and I'm seeing a large amount of 400 BADREQ erros:
Nov 21 22:46:06 srvr1 haproxy[28293]: 10.10.10.10:51184
[21/Nov/2014:22:45:50.323] www www/NOSRV -1/-1/-1/-1/16350 400 187 - -
PRNN 445/445/0/0/3 0/0 {|||} BADREQ
Nov 21 22:47:46 srvr1 haproxy[28293]:
I think most of us are getting soft being gmail users. I haven't seen
this amount of spam in my inbox today, probably in years. Personally, I
would go with an automated sub/unsub list. People who need help will
usually take the effort to subscribe to a list, so I'm not sure what the
advantage
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
snip
Now please let me remind me something important : this list is provided
for free to make it easier for developers and users to exchange together.
It's managed on spare time, it's fast and free to subscribe just like it's
Hey guys,
I couldn't a bug tracker for HAProxy, and I found a serious bug in 1.5.1
that may be a harbinger of other broken things in header manipulation.
The bug is:
I added 'http-send-name-header sfdev1' unde the defaults section of
haproxy.cfg.
When we would do a POST with that option
15 matches
Mail list logo
