Re: SSL, peered sticky tables + nbproc > 1?

2014-05-27 Thread Andrew Phillips
your point about the processes state depending on others, which does not seem to be the case. Hopefully that's not too late. Andy -- Andrew Phillips Director Technical Operations Direct: +44 (0)203 192 2509 Mobile: +44 (0)7595 242 900 LMAX, Yellow Building, 1A Nicholas Road, London, W11 4AN

Re: SSL, peered sticky tables + nbproc > 1?

2014-05-18 Thread Andrew Phillips
nnection counts - then other multicast/broadcast alternatives could work. > > So as you can see, I'm having mixed opinions. I'm thinking that in its > current form, your patch is too limited for general use, that a per-bind > leastconn distribution would make a lot more sense,