Re: HAProxy Next?

On 2013-12-17 03:14, Annika Wickert wrote: - accesslist for statssocket or ldap authentication for stats socket For ldap auth I presume you mean the web ui. You could accomplish this today by proxying through httpd (or equivalent). Yes, it’s a possibility but why put another service

HAProxy Next?

Hi all, we did some thinking about how to improve haproxy and which features we’d like to see in next versions. We came up with the following list and would like to discuss if they can be done/should be done or not. - One global statssocket which can be switched through to see stats of every

Re: HAProxy Next?

Hi, Hi, My answers inline. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Annika Wickert a.wick...@traviangames.com wrote: - One global statssocket which can be switched through to see stats of every bind process. And also an overall overview summed up from all backends and frontends. - One global

Re: HAProxy Next?

Hi Hi! - sflow output Can't log-format already do this? Sure, but it might be a better integration in the rest of networking infrastructure if sflow is supported. FYI, Neil Mckee has a fork available with sflow support: http://marc.info/?t=13673552702r=1w=2

Re: splice(0xedb, 0, 0xf09, 0, 0x72b0, 0x3) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)

Hi Willy, On 13 Dec 2013, at 02:13, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 03:43:09PM +, Annika Wickert wrote: - Two Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X6550 @ 2.00GHz in each cluster node - 2x Emulex Corporation OneConnect 10Gb NIC (rev 02) in each cluster node - 32gbit RAM in each

Re: Multiprocess Loadsharing

accordingly. On 04 Dec 2013, at 17:20, Chris Burroughs chris.burrou...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/28/2013 03:10 AM, Annika Wickert wrote: Is this a normal behaviour? http://imgur.com/I7sRWy2 A graph of similar behavior at nbproc=3. Anecdotally the variance seems to be higher under lower loads.

splice(0xedb, 0, 0xf09, 0, 0x72b0, 0x3) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)

Hi everybody, we have a few regarding load at our Haproxy 1.5-dev19 cluster. We run constantly at a load of 12 - 15 most of it is system load. I started to do debugging with strace and see constantly the following message: epoll_ctl(0, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 1541, {EPOLLIN|0x2000, {u32=1541,

Re: splice(0xedb, 0, 0xf09, 0, 0x72b0, 0x3) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)

Hi, I am sorry I forgot to attach the necessary files :x. On 09 Dec 2013, at 14:56, Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Annika, we have a few regarding load at our Haproxy 1.5-dev19 cluster. We run constantly at a load of 12 - 15 most of it is system load. [...] On our old

Re: splice(0xedb, 0, 0xf09, 0, 0x72b0, 0x3) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)

Hi, There are some bugs with splice in 1.5-dev19... they have been fixed. See this thread for the patches: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.haproxy/12774 (Or google for: Oh and by the way, the bug was present since 1.5-dev12. ) thank you for the hint. I will try this on

Re: splice(0xedb, 0, 0xf09, 0, 0x72b0, 0x3) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)

Hi, Hi There are some bugs with splice in 1.5-dev19... they have been fixed. See this thread for the patches: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.haproxy/12774 (Or google for: Oh and by the way, the bug was present since 1.5-dev12. ) This is not what Annika is seeing; that bug is about

Multiprocess Loadsharing

Hi, I’ve been wondering how requests are balanced across the multiple haproxy instances in multiprocess mode. Because we see some of our 16 haproxy process get more load than the other ones: 14725 root 20 0 162M 100M 1416 R 100. 0.3 4:42.18 /usr/sbin/haproxy -D -f

Any news regarding multiple stats sockets

Hello, are there any news regarding the multi-stats socket for more than one bind-process? Best regards, Annika --- Systemadministration Travian Games GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 22 80807 München Germany a.wick...@traviangames.commailto:a.wick...@traviangames.com