I am unable to un-subscribe from the list, where is the admin?

Hey List Admin, I have tried more then once to un-subscribe from the haproxy@formilux.org list and am unable to do so. I went to the page: http://www.haproxy.org/#tact and found that the Address I need to send an email is: haproxy+unsubscr...@formilux.org <

Re: SNI and haproxy backend selection.

Thanks!! Eliezer On 21/02/2016 14:01, Lukas Tribus wrote: But can I use the SNI hostname to define which backend will haproxy use and by that choose also between different protocol? Absolutely! http://blog.haproxy.com/2012/04/13/enhanced-ssl-load-balancing-with-server-name-indication-sni-tls

Re: SNI and haproxy backend selection.

On 21/02/2016 05:43, Jeff Palmer wrote: You'd probably want to use host header ACLs, and then a use_backend with each acl to select the correct backend. But the Host header is for HTTP only. My question is: I have more then two services and each one of them is using either a TCP or HTTP based p

SNI and haproxy backend selection.

Is it possible to have one TLS frontend(with wildcard certificate) port that will select the backends based on the TLS SNI? having one specific default for SNI-less connections? Eliezer

Re: HAproxy version 1.5 on centos 6.5

Hey, You are trying to install a fedora RPM on CentOS 6.5, it's not a good thing to do in general since these OS have a very different structure. You can either build haproxy from sources or build your own RPM. What have you tried else then the fedora 22 RPM? Eliezer On 22/10/2015 11:00, Wil

Two things: proxy protocol v2 example and a missing article.

Hey List, I am writing a proxy protocol parser in golang and I need some help. I am looking for couple proxy protocol v2 examples for testing purposes. I am looking for couple strings which I can throw at my parser. The first thing to do is just run a haproxy and dump the strings but I think it'

Re: HAProxy - Load Balancing + GeoIP

Hey There, There are couple options to load balance: DNS or APPLICATION level. The DNS level is using GeoIP based dns load-balancing that will decide based on the srcIP what dns results to send. The APPLICATION level is to use a default site address that will have a 302 Redirection based on Ge

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.5.0

If building a package for CentOS for basic usage and testing is possible I think that many will like the idea. (I am not using haproxy in general but it seems to like there are many who do use it) Eliezer On 06/20/2014 07:07 PM, Ryan O'Hara wrote: If you want haproxy 1.5 on CentOS in the near

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.5.0

On 06/19/2014 10:54 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: Don't forget to offer a beer to your distro packagers who make your life easier. It's hard to list them all, but if you don't build from sources, you're likely running a package made and maintained by one of these people : - debian: Vincent Bernat,

Re: Introducing Aura for haproxy

Hey Dave, I was wondering if there is a way to buy the software for local usage for places like enterprise or any similar secured environment? It looks very good and in a case of a 200+ nodes in a farm a LB is a product that fills more then one slot out of the 200+. Thanks, Eliezer On 10/

Re: SMTP load balancer.

On 5/2/2013 6:14 AM, Godbach wrote: Hi, Eliezer It seems that smtp1 and smpt2 have the same IP:Port > server smtp1 192.168.25.1:25 maxconn 10 > server smtp2 192.168.25.1:25 maxconn 10 Indeed. I noticed that but forgot to fix it while quoting from the new mail ##start liste

Re: SMTP load balancer.

On 5/2/2013 5:46 AM, Godbach wrote: On 5/1/2013 8:39 AM, Bryan Talbot wrote: Looks like you've listed the same IP address twice. -Bryan Typo, Thanks. How have I missed that?? Eliezer Hi, Elizer You can use roundrobin instead of leastconn as below: listen tcp 0.0.0.0:225 mode

Re: SMTP load balancer.

On 5/1/2013 8:39 AM, Bryan Talbot wrote: Looks like you've listed the same IP address twice. -Bryan Typo, Thanks. How have I missed that?? Eliezer

SMTP load balancer.

hey I have tried to build a small load balancer to a smtp service. my haproxy.conf is: ##conf start global log 127.0.0.1 local0 log 127.0.0.1 local1 notice #log loghost local0 info maxconn 4096 #chroot /usr/share/haproxy uid 99 gid 99

HTTP/2 will Host: header removal makes things faster?

Host: header. Thanks, -- Eliezer Croitoru