On 19-06-15 17:46:52, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>> [...]
>
> No objections from my side (and it can always be retrieved back from
> git), I'm replying, because I want to suggest to take a look at the
> other files in the folder as well:
>
> - auth.cfg : 10 years and IMO explained well in th
On 19-02-13 16:27:21, Hugues Alary wrote:
> (Also, I've been looking for commit 451c5a88 and can't find it
> anywhere).
See http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-1.9.git;a=commit;h=451c5a88, also
attached.
Cheers,
Georg
From 451c5a8879a9d59b489ad5117c984044d41c8338 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will
On 18-03-23 19:40:20, Holger Amann wrote:
> > Am 23.03.2018 um 17:59 schrieb Willy Tarreau :
> > Holger, if you could send me your core and unstripped haproxy
> > executable in private, that would be really cool.
>
> I tried to send it per mail, but it came back because of size limit on
> your sit
On 18-03-12 07:22:22, Dan Kohn wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:42:30AM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> > > Have you asked the maintainer of the github fork to change the project to
> > > 'unofficial-haproxy' or something else?
> >
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:15 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote
Hi Aleksey,
On 18-03-12 07:04:05, Aleksey Gordeev wrote:
> Thank you for answer. Sorry for stupid question. Found it. I forget
> about letsencrypt. it restarts when renewing certificates.
Change it so it does only restart after renewing. I guess, Most of time
it only checks, but doesn't renew.
A
Hi,
On 18-03-05 09:42:56, flamese...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
> Or only the data of the process to which the stat is bind to?
AFAIK, that is correct.
Cheers,
Georg
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On 17-11-21 14:20:39, Daniel Schneller wrote:
> > On 21. Nov. 2017, at 14:08, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> > [...]
> > Instead of hiding specific errors counters, why not send an actual
> > HTTP request that triggers a 200 OK response? So health checking is
> > not exempt from the statistics and onl
On 17-10-08 21:55:37, William Lallemand wrote:
> * To change the KillMode to the default, which should kill -SIGTERM
> all processes on a stop or restart. But if I remember well, it leads
> to a bad exit code on the systemd side and display an error.
There is SuccessExitStatus [1] which might help
On 17-08-30 09:33:23, Julian Zielke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm struggeling with enabling SSL forward secrecy in my haproxy 1.7 setup.
>
> So far the global settings look like:
>
> tune.ssl.default-dh-param 2048 # tune shared secred to 2048bits
>
> ssl-default-bind-options force-tlsv12 no-sslv3
>
On 17-08-30 11:12:15, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Cyril Bonté wrote:
>
> > Well health checks or not, the state file reflects the state you want.
> > You can absolutely imagine cases where health checks were never activated,
> > and someone used the CLI to set a serv
Hi Andrzej,
On 17-08-21 09:48:05, Andrzej Sobociński wrote:
> I found bug in haproxy 1.7, also not working in ver 1.6
Could ypu elaborate where / when the bugs is to be found, exactly? What
did you expect, and what did happen?
Thanks,
Georg
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Brian,
On 17-08-15 14:15:26, Gibson, Brian (IMS) wrote:
> Well that worked. I didn't see any warnings before at startup no, but
> that may be because I use puppet to deploy my configurations and
> restart services as needed. Thanks for finding my simple mistake!
I'm using puppet as well, test
Hi,
On 17-08-15 04:46:32, baiyang wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> My question is: Could the logical servers such as "n1_1" and "n1_2"
> share the same check status as "n1_0"? This eliminates the need for
> these logical servers to send duplicate requests to the same physical
> server.
>
> e.g.: When "n1_0"
Hi Jonathan,
On 17-06-13 17:04:22, Jonathan Quinn wrote:
> I'm trying to implement a health check within HAProxy but update the
> host depending on the backend server the request is sent to:
I'm curious: Did you implement anything which would be worth to share?
Cheers,
Georg
signature.asc
Desc
Hi Niklas,
On 17-06-27 16:27:37, Niklas Dallmann wrote:
> However for my purposes the client shall not have any notice of a
> downtime.
Not sure if this is possible.
> Therefore I want to make Haproxy health check the servers before
> connecting them to the client. Is it possible to achieve thi
On 17-06-14 13:58:01, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 12.06.2017 16:21, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
> > In haproxy 1.8dev, default certificate can now be optional.
> > This patch allow that.
>
> This looks like a big footgun. While the idea is interesting and
> useful if this is to be considered at a
Hi Jonathan,
On 17-06-13 17:04:22, Jonathan Quinn wrote:
> I'm trying to implement a health check within HAProxy but update the
> host depending on the backend server the request is sent to:
>
> [...]
>
> Each machine would ideally be checked, so I was interested if there
> was a way to dynamical
Hi Matt,
On 17-03-16 12:00:46, Matt Jamison wrote:
> When I have alpn and h2 set on the bind line, no requests can get past
> the frontend. I disabled all back ends so that at least the 503 error
> page I have set would come up but no go.
>
> [...]
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
This currently
Hi Matthias,
On 17-03-06 09:34:07, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> are problem with haproxy 1.7.3 on FreeBSD 11.0-p8 known?
I'm not running FreeBSD myself, but have a look at [1]: In the
follow-ups to this thread there are two more people reporting problems.
Cheers,
Georg
[1] https://www.mail-archiv
19 matches
Mail list logo