It isn't really the use case we need.
Is it possible to open an issue somewhere with this idea ?
I didn't see a bug tracker for haproxy.
Regards.
--
Ludovic Gasc (GMLudo)
Lead Developer Architect at ALLOcloud
https://be.linkedin.com/in/ludovicgasc
2017-09-18 2:21 GMT+02:00 Igor Cicim
at that point is empty.
>
Exactly.
No idea to avoid that.
>
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Ludovic Gasc wrote:
>
>> I have tested with HAProxy 1.7.
>>
>> Where you see that it's a feature of 1.8 ?
>> You mean I could try my piece of configuration on HA
I have tested with HAProxy 1.7.
Where you see that it's a feature of 1.8 ?
You mean I could try my piece of configuration on HAProxy 1.8, it should
work ?
Regards.
2017-09-15 14:47 GMT+02:00 Igor Cicimov :
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Ludovic Gasc wrote:
>
>&
Hi,
I imagine that if I have no answer, it's because it isn't possible with
HAProxy ?
Thanks for your return.
2017-09-10 22:27 GMT+02:00 Ludovic Gasc :
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to reproduce this Nginx configuration with HAProxy:
> https://memz.co/reverse-proxy-nginx-dock
on like with Nginx.
Do I missed something ?
BTW, thanks for HAProxy, I like a lot this product ;-)
Regards.
--
Ludovic Gasc (GMLudo)
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hi Ludovic,
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Before 1.5 release of HAProxy, I used Nginx for SSL and serve static
> files.
> > But now, I use only Nginx to serve static files, because I've better
> > performances with HAProxy for SSL.
> >
> > I know that
27;ve the feeling that
HAProxy could do that better than others Web servers.
Regards.
--
Ludovic Gasc
7 matches
Mail list logo