Hi,
(Disclaimer: I don't mean to start a religious discussion!)
Does anyone have any comparative experiences in running HAProxy on Linux
and FreeBSD? I'm especially interested in performance - in particular CPU
load. I don't have much experience with FreeBSD, and have read
conflicting informat
Hi Lukas,
We're on 64 bit CPUs. I used:
TARGET=linux2628 CPU=generic USE_PCRE=1
So, will this have compiled to 32bits (without using the ARCH=x86_64
option)?
Cheers
On 7 March 2016 at 14:32, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> > One last question. Would there be a performance benefit in
> > using CPU=i6
One last question. Would there be a performance benefit in using CPU=i686
over CPU=generic? (I think I can be fairly sure that our host will always
expose Intel CPUs)
On 7 March 2016 at 14:04, SL wrote:
> Thanks for your help everyone. I've recompiled with the CPU=generic
> optio
Thanks for your help everyone. I've recompiled with the CPU=generic
option, and it's all working again.
On 7 March 2016 at 13:37, SL wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thank you for your quick replies! (I'm grateful that HAproxy has such a
> great community).
>
> >&
inally compile with these options (oops). Will
recompile and report back.
Thank you.
On 7 March 2016 at 13:35, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hi SL,
>
>
> > ./haproxy -v
> > Illegal Instruction
> >
> > sudo/haproxy -v
> > [no output]
> >
> > Same thing
Hi,
I hope someone can offer some insight here, as I'm currently at a bit of a
loss, and our service is down. We are running HAproxy 1.6.1 on Debian 8
virtuial machines. I was moving our 2 instances to a different size VM,
however, when I rebooted they did not come back up.
I can't even run the
ative -g -fno-strict-aliasing
-Wdeclaration-after-statement
OPTIONS = USE_LINUX_SPLICE=1 USE_LINUX_TPROXY=1 USE_LIBCRYPT=1
USE_POLL=default USE_OPENSSL=yes USE_PCRE=1
On 3 December 2015 at 09:43, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 3 décembre 2015 08:59 +0100, SL :
>
> > I'm trying to
Hi,
I'm trying to use the cpu-map directive on haproxy 1.6 (Debian 8), but am
getting the error:
'cpu-map' is not enabled, please check build options for USE_CPU_AFFINITY
I understand from this that I need to recompile with some different
options, but could anyone point me in the direction of ho
> use_backend %[req.hdr(host),lower]
Is there anyway to extract the host subdomain to use like this (rather than
the full hostname)? I can't see any obvious way to do it from the manual,
but perhaps I'm missing something.
On 14 November 2015 at 22:14, SL wrote:
> @Igor - thank
> use_backend %[req.hdr(host),lower]
Is there anyway to extract the host subdomain to use like this (rather than
the full hostname)? I can't see any obvious way to do it from the manual,
but perhaps I'm missing something.
Hmm, it seems to be working again now - not sure what has changed, but will
investigate. Thanks for the response, and sorry for wasting your time.
On 16 November 2015 at 17:02, Marco Corte wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Does haproxy start manually? Is it only a systemd issue?
>
>
> Il 16
Hi,
Today I cloned a server which is running haproxy 1.6 on a debian8 server
without problems. However, for some reason the clone refuses to start
haproxy (IPs and hostname have been updated of course).
Probably I'm missing something simple, but I can't think what it is. I
have very little expe
@Igor - thanks, I didn't know about that map feature, I think it could be
useful in a number of situations.
@Baptiste - Ah, it is possible dynamically, that's great - thank you!
On 14 November 2015 at 22:05, Baptiste wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 3:21 PM, SL wrote:
> >
Hi,
We have quite a large number of backends, and are selecting which back end
to use based on the host specified in the request. (Note these are not
loadbalanced, we have to target them individually).
Currently we are doing this with ACLs, e.g. for each:
acl svr1_request hdr_beg(host) -i s
Hmm, thought I'd tried that, but it's working, thanks!
On 22 October 2015 at 13:24, Jarno Huuskonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, SL wrote:
> > I couldn't get my original stats config to work (currently just removed).
> > Can anyone suggest how I should
realm Haproxy\ Statistics
stats hide-version
stats enable
mode http
On 21 October 2015 at 23:26, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Le 21/10/2015 22:16, Lukas Tribus a écrit :
>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:14 PM, SL wrote:
>>>
>>>&
I'll be doing an upgrade from 1.4 to 1.6 tomorrow. Just wondering if there
are any changed defaults, breaking changes, anything like that? Or should
my config work as before?
Thank you!
Hi,
New 1.6 features look interesting from the news item. Is there a
comprehensive description of the new features anywhere?
Thanks
S
I currenty have a line in our HAProxy config that I uncomment when I
want to put the site into 'maintenance mode'. It just redirects
requests not for the static subdomain to a maintenance page.
redirect location http://static.site.com/maintenance.htm unless {
hdr(host) -i static.site.com }
Of
19 matches
Mail list logo
