Re: http://haproxy.1wt.eu/ down?

Thanks for the feedback On 10 October 2012 14:54, Baptiste wrote: > Hi, > > without delivering private information, it may be down for 2 long days... > stay tuned. > > cheers > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:20 PM, tiago ramos wrote: >> Same here, it could be jus

Re: http://haproxy.1wt.eu/ down?

Same here, it could be just to show that it uses haproxy :) On 10 October 2012 14:14, Gerd Müller wrote: > I am getting 503 back. > > Gerd

Re: HAProxy with native SSL support !

Great day indeed, can't wait to do some tests. Thanks On 3 September 2012 20:37, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi all, > > today is a great day (could say night considering the time I'm posting) ! > > After several months of efforts by the Exceliance team, we managed to > rework all the buffer and conn

balance uri depth 1.5dev10

Hi, We are testing dev10. we are having issues with "balance uri depth", it doesn't seem to work at all. The same configuration is working in dev7 balance uri depth 2 Did the balance algorithm changed, i couldn't find it in the documentation, are we doing anything wrong?

Re: rabbitmq and haproxy

During the 50 sec is there any king of activity going on ? On 13 February 2012 10:12, tiago ramos wrote: > During the 50 sec is there any king of activity going on ? > > > On 10 February 2012 19:53, Baptiste wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Sounds like you reached the client o

Re: Haproxy with sock.js

On 9 February 2012 20:24, Baptiste wrote: > Hi, > > Have you disabled both http-server-close and http-close options? i Disabled both > > Worste case, try to turn HAProxy on tcp mode. > Tried also, doesn't work > cheers > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:43 PM, t

Haproxy with sock.js

Hi, I'm having issues with safari connecting via websocks through haproxy, works with polling. The issue started after the upgrade to sock.js 0.2. the main difference is that this new version uses faye module. An issue is already open https://github.com/faye/faye-websocket-node/issues/13 can anyth

subscribe