Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: CI caching improvement

2022-03-08 Thread William Lallemand
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:05:31PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > > Let me make a competing proposal that: > > 1. Keeps the complexity out of the GitHub workflow configuration in > haproxy/haproxy. > 2. Still allows VTest caching. > > For my https://github.com/TimWolla/haproxy-auth-request repos

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: CI caching improvement

2022-03-08 Thread Tim Düsterhus
William, On 3/8/22 20:54, William Lallemand wrote: Honestly I'm confused, it is overcomplicated in my opinion :( I don't really see the benefits in creating a whole new repository instead of the few lines in the yaml file. I believe that having a non-trivial amount of logic in a YAML file wil

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: CI caching improvement

2022-03-08 Thread Tim Düsterhus
William, On 3/8/22 21:30, Tim Düsterhus wrote: - The action is also easily reusable by other projects. For testing my Adding to that: It's also easily reusable by the other workflows. We currently have the separate musl.yml workflow that does this: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/blob/5c