Hi Krzysztof,
I forgot to check the list and did not see your mail.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:33:56AM +0100, Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki wrote:
Changes in this version:
- documentation
- close race between a started check and health analysis event
- don't force fastinter if it is not set
-
On 2009-12-15 23:07, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
Hi Willy,
I forgot to check the list and did not see your mail.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:33:56AM +0100, Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki wrote:
Changes in this version:
- documentation
- close race between a started check and health
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:29:33PM +0100, Krzysztof Ol?dzki wrote:
+error_limit count
error-limit please :-)
Sure. Would you like a new patch with that change?
No, don't waste your time on cosmetics. I've noticed you sent v3 while
I was replying, I'll sed on v3.
(...)
Maybe I'm not very
Subject: [RFC] Decrease server health based on http responses / events, version
2
This RFC quality patch implements decreasing server health based on
observing communication between HAProxy and servers.
Changes in this version:
- documentation
- close race between a started check and health
On 2009-12-10 08:39, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
Hi Willy,
(...)
What are those events supposed to check for ? I've not found them
anywhere else.
Ineed. It is for pure TCP, where we can only track timeouts, resets,
etc. However, I'm looking for a good place where to attach those
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:17:30PM +0100, Krzysztof Ol?dzki wrote:
(...)
events by itself might not be the proper name then. For instance, a
timeout is precisely a lack of event.
It's a matter of definition, like if 0 is or is not a natural number.
For me timeout *is* one of events, but no
On 2009-12-08 22:37, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
Hi Willy,
it was fortunate that you reminded me about this mail because
I had lost it in the middle of a few others.
No problem. Like I told you in the private mail - it is doubtful I would
have been able to get to it earlier, anyway.
Hi Krzysztof,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:23:57PM +0100, Krzysztof Ol?dzki wrote:
There are four modes:
- fastinter: force fastinter
- failchk: simlate a failed check - force fastinter
OK so that one should decrease the health each time we get a
series of errors, that's it ?
Hi Krzysztof,
it was fortunate that you reminded me about this mail because
I had lost it in the middle of a few others.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 01:35:35AM +0200, Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki wrote:
Subject: [RFC] Decrease server health based on http responses / events
This RFC quality patch
9 matches
Mail list logo
