On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 02:34:25PM +, Damien Claisse wrote:
> When adding a server dynamically, we observe that when a backend has a
> dynamic persistence cookie, the new server has no cookie as we receive
> the following HTTP header:
> set-cookie: test-cookie=; Expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:0
When adding a server dynamically, we observe that when a backend has a
dynamic persistence cookie, the new server has no cookie as we receive
the following HTTP header:
set-cookie: test-cookie=; Expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:01 GMT; path=/
Whereas we were expecting to receive something like the fo
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 09:45:59AM +, Damien Claisse wrote:
> Hi Amaury!
> Sorry for the HTML message, I have to use a *** well-known enterprise MUA :(
> Le 22/03/2024 09:09, « Amaury Denoyelle » a écrit :
>> This patch raises several interrogations. First, dynamic servers are
>> currently int
Hi Amaury!
Sorry for the HTML message, I have to use a *** well-known enterprise MUA :(
Le 22/03/2024 09:09, « Amaury Denoyelle » a écrit :
This patch raises several interrogations. First, dynamic servers are
currently intended to not support cookies, hence why the keyword is
disabled for them.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 02:37:06PM +, Damien Claisse wrote:
> When adding a server dynamically, we observe that when a backend has a
> dynamic persistence cookie, the new server has no cookie as we receive
> the following HTTP header:
> set-cookie: test-cookie=; Expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:0
When adding a server dynamically, we observe that when a backend has a
dynamic persistence cookie, the new server has no cookie as we receive
the following HTTP header:
set-cookie: test-cookie=; Expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:01 GMT; path=/
Whereas we were expecting to receive something like the fo
6 matches
Mail list logo
