Hi,
patch applied now, thanks!
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 03:24:36PM -0700, Thayne McCombs wrote:
> > I'm just wondering if it technically would be necessary to remove the
> server from the tree or not?
>
> I don't think so. But I'm not sure.
I don't think it's strictly necessary, however I really
> I'm just wondering if it technically would be necessary to remove the
server from the tree or not?
I don't think so. But I'm not sure.
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021, 06:34 Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Thayne,
>
> Am 09.01.21 um 08:45 schrieb Thayne McCombs:
> >
> > After actually reading the full CONTRIBUTIN
Thayne,
Am 09.01.21 um 08:45 schrieb Thayne McCombs:
>
> After actually reading the full CONTRIBUTING file, I now include my patch
> with a better commit message. Sorry about that.
>
Thanks, the commit message looks good to me and I can confirm your patch
fixes the issue I was seeing.
I'm jus
After actually reading the full CONTRIBUTING file, I now include my patch with
a better commit message. Sorry about that.
>From b449379a7b36c213408b1ae28924475c413bd6ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thayne McCombs
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 22:11:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] BUG/MINOR: server: Memory l
Fixes #1037
---
src/haproxy.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/haproxy.c b/src/haproxy.c
index a28b45fb9..1d16b507d 100644
--- a/src/haproxy.c
+++ b/src/haproxy.c
@@ -2649,6 +2649,7 @@ void deinit(void)
free(s->available_conns);
5 matches
Mail list logo