Re: [PATCH] MINOR: ssl: BoringSSL matches OpenSSL 1.1.0

Hi Manu, On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:34:46AM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote: > It's ok because this function is inserted upper in the patch. > > As said, it's only a revert from 019f9b10 patches for openssl-compat.h. > From: > # Functions introduced in OpenSSL 1.1.0 and not yet present in LibreSSL

Re: [PATCH] MINOR: ssl: BoringSSL matches OpenSSL 1.1.0

Le 25 juil. 2018 à 10:34, Emmanuel Hocdet a écrit :Hi WillyLe 24 juil. 2018 à 18:59, Willy Tarreau a écrit :Hi Manu,On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 06:12:34PM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:Hi Willy,This patch is necessary to build with current BoringSSL (SSL_SESSION is now

Re: [PATCH] MINOR: ssl: BoringSSL matches OpenSSL 1.1.0

Hi Willy > Le 24 juil. 2018 à 18:59, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > > Hi Manu, > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 06:12:34PM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote: >> Hi Willy, >> >> This patch is necessary to build with current BoringSSL (SSL_SESSION is now >> opaque). >> BoringSSL correctly matches OpenSSL

Re: [PATCH] MINOR: ssl: BoringSSL matches OpenSSL 1.1.0

Hi Manu, On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 06:12:34PM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote: > Hi Willy, > > This patch is necessary to build with current BoringSSL (SSL_SESSION is now > opaque). > BoringSSL correctly matches OpenSSL 1.1.0 since 3b2ff028 for haproxy needs. > The patch revert part of haproxy

[PATCH] MINOR: ssl: BoringSSL matches OpenSSL 1.1.0

Hi Willy, This patch is necessary to build with current BoringSSL (SSL_SESSION is now opaque). BoringSSL correctly matches OpenSSL 1.1.0 since 3b2ff028 for haproxy needs. The patch revert part of haproxy 019f9b10 (openssl-compat.h). This will not break openssl/libressl compat. Can you consider