Re: [PATCH] refactor specific openssl early data detection check

2020-10-27 Thread Илья Шипицин
Good good good On Tue, Oct 27, 2020, 5:10 PM William Lallemand wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:51:57PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote: > > Hi, > > > > "#ifdef SSL_READ_EARLY_DATA_SUCCESS" seem to be better > > than version based check. > > > > it is preparation to unlocking BoringSSL 1.1.1

Re: [PATCH] refactor specific openssl early data detection check

2020-10-27 Thread William Lallemand
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:51:57PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote: > Hi, > > "#ifdef SSL_READ_EARLY_DATA_SUCCESS" seem to be better > than version based check. > > it is preparation to unlocking BoringSSL 1.1.1 compatibility version. > > > > cheers, > Ilya Totally agree with this, merged in

Re: [PATCH] refactor specific openssl early data detection check

2020-10-27 Thread Илья Шипицин
ping :) сб, 24 окт. 2020 г. в 23:51, Илья Шипицин : > Hi, > > "#ifdef SSL_READ_EARLY_DATA_SUCCESS" seem to be better > than version based check. > > it is preparation to unlocking BoringSSL 1.1.1 compatibility version. > > > > cheers, > Ilya >

[PATCH] refactor specific openssl early data detection check

2020-10-24 Thread Илья Шипицин
Hi, "#ifdef SSL_READ_EARLY_DATA_SUCCESS" seem to be better than version based check. it is preparation to unlocking BoringSSL 1.1.1 compatibility version. cheers, Ilya From 9839ce3ca71090270f3b44b5ad71112b8aa8f81c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya Shipitsin Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 23:42:30