Willy,
Ilya,
Am 13.03.20 um 12:06 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>> I just realized that BUG_ON is not active by default (should we add
>> DEBUG_STRICT=1 to CI?). The check in there does not even compile (facepalm).
>
> Yes, definitely a good idea.
I've filed an issue for the CI expert Ilya to look into
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 01:15:40PM +0100, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> @@ -1466,6 +1466,20 @@ int make_proxy_line_v2(char *buf, int buf_len, struct
> server *srv, struct connec
> ret += make_tlv(&buf[ret], (buf_len - ret),
> PP2_TYPE_AUTHORITY, value_len, value);
>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:07:38PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Am 06.03.20 um 13:15 schrieb Tim Duesterhus:
> > is acceptable. There's also a `BUG_ON` left in the patch, because I wasn't
> > sure if I should grab the session from the stream or from the connection.
>
> I just realized
Willy,
Am 06.03.20 um 13:15 schrieb Tim Duesterhus:
> is acceptable. There's also a `BUG_ON` left in the patch, because I wasn't
> sure if I should grab the session from the stream or from the connection.
I just realized that BUG_ON is not active by default (should we add
DEBUG_STRICT=1 to CI?).
Willy,
this patch adds the sending of generated unique IDs using PROXYv2. I'm not
sure whether the way I made the stream available in the proxy line sending
is acceptable. There's also a `BUG_ON` left in the patch, because I wasn't
sure if I should grab the session from the stream or from the conn
5 matches
Mail list logo