Hi Ryan,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:11:39PM -0500, Ryan Brock wrote:
Willy,
I tested these changes in my environment and it all works. So you may move
forward with these changes.
Great, thanks for the feedback!
I really appreciate the help.
You're welcome :-)
Best regards,
Willy
Willy,
I tested these changes in my environment and it all works. So you may move
forward with these changes.
I really appreciate the help.
- Ryan Brock
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Ryan,
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:36:24PM -0500, Ryan Brock wrote:
Hi Ryan,
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:36:24PM -0500, Ryan Brock wrote:
Here is the change I made on the very latest 1.6 master dev. It is only in
the one spot. There was discussion of changing it in a few other spots were
status was checked for less than 200, but I wouldn't know how to test that
Here is the change I made on the very latest 1.6 master dev. It is only in
the one spot. There was discussion of changing it in a few other spots were
status was checked for less than 200, but I wouldn't know how to test that
correctly so I didn't feel it was a good idea to change it.
This change
I can do it. I should learn the process for submitting changes anyway. I'll
base it on 1.6.
Thanks for the help. Really appreciate it.
- Ryan
On Aug 28, 2014 7:18 AM, Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi Willy,
I think that experimenting with (txn-status 200 txn-status != 101)
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 07:25:07AM -0500, Ryan Brock wrote:
I can do it. I should learn the process for submitting changes anyway. I'll
base it on 1.6.
Thanks for the help. Really appreciate it.
Thanks Ryan. There's nothing fundamental in the way to submit changes. If
you want to ensure
I apologize, but I am not sure the usual procedure regarding changes. What
is the next step? Should I put together a change that simply looks for
status codes less than 200, but that is not 101? Or did we need more
discussion?
I see your point about HSTS. I am not familiar enough with HAProxy
Hi Ryan,
I apologize, but I am not sure the usual procedure regarding changes.
What is the next step? Should I put together a change that simply looks
for status codes less than 200, but that is not 101? Or did we need
more discussion?
I would like to hear Willy's opinion about
Hi Ryan,
I recently started investigating using HAProxy to ensure that multiple
WebSocket connections from the same browser (or device) end up
communicating with the same application server. Forwarding all
connections from the same origin to the respective application server
greatly
9 matches
Mail list logo