Hi Michael,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:12:48PM -0400, Michael Ezzell wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2016 8:09 AM, "Willy Tarreau" wrote:
> >
>
> > I learned it 18 years ago when QNX was shipping a fully working OS and
> browser
> > on a single diskette. The browser used to connect to
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:37:37AM +0200, Daniel Schneller wrote:
>
> > On 12.04.2016, at 14:07, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> >> I will at least provide a documentation patch then, soon.
> >
> > OK.
>
> As promised, a few words, hopefully clarifying things in the docs.
That's very
On Apr 12, 2016 8:09 AM, "Willy Tarreau" wrote:
>
> I learned it 18 years ago when QNX was shipping a fully working OS and
browser
> on a single diskette. The browser used to connect to http://127.1/ and
since
> then I don't think I have ever typed 127.0.0.1 anymore. Same for most
On 12.04.2016, at 14:07, Willy Tarreau wrote:I will at least provide a documentation patch then, soon.OK.As promised, a few words, hopefully clarifying things in the docs.
0001-DOC-Clarify-IPv4-address-mask-notation-rules.patch
Description: Binary data
Cheers,Daniel
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:47:25PM +0200, Daniel Schneller wrote:
> Hi Willy!
>
> Thanks for looking into this. As mentioned in an earlier post I don???t have
> any relevant C skills (but have been writing Java other languages); but still
> I went into the code, telling myself ???how
Hi Willy!
Thanks for looking into this. As mentioned in an earlier post I don’t have any
relevant C skills (but have been writing Java other languages); but still I
went into the code, telling myself “how hard could it be to add a warning for
less than three dots with a mask”. I quickly
Hi guys,
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 03:38:39PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> On 09/04/2016 02:59 , Daniel Schneller wrote:
> > Hi Pavlos!
> >
> >> On 09.04.2016, at 11:39, Pavlos Parissis
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08/04/2016 11:59 , Daniel Schneller wrote:
>
On 09/04/2016 02:59 μμ, Daniel Schneller wrote:
> Hi Pavlos!
>
>> On 09.04.2016, at 11:39, Pavlos Parissis
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/04/2016 11:59 πμ, Daniel Schneller wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I noticed that while this ACL matches my source IP of
>>> 192.168.42.123:
>>>
Hi Pavlos!
> On 09.04.2016, at 11:39, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>
> On 08/04/2016 11:59 πμ, Daniel Schneller wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I noticed that while this ACL matches my source IP of 192.168.42.123:
>>
>> acl src_internal_net src 192.168.42.0/24
>>
>> this one
On 08/04/2016 11:59 πμ, Daniel Schneller wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I noticed that while this ACL matches my source IP of 192.168.42.123:
>
> acl src_internal_net src 192.168.42.0/24
>
> this one does _not_:
>
> acl src_internal_net src 192.168.42/24
>
> While not strictly part of RFC 4632
Hi!
I noticed that while this ACL matches my source IP of 192.168.42.123:
acl src_internal_net src 192.168.42.0/24
this one does _not_:
acl src_internal_net src 192.168.42/24
While not strictly part of RFC 4632 (yet), leaving out trailing .0
octets is a very common notation and is
11 matches
Mail list logo