On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 03:08:18PM -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/24/2015 1:23 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Thus my first goal with HTTP/2 in haproxy really is to make it a
> > solid H2->H1 gateway in order to provide a seamless migration to H2
> > to everyone, just like haproxy was massively us
On 6/24/2015 1:23 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Thus my first goal with HTTP/2 in haproxy really is to make it a
> solid H2->H1 gateway in order to provide a seamless migration to H2
> to everyone, just like haproxy was massively used to provide IPv6
> connectivity for the last IPv6 day.
>
> I'll sti
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:26:24AM -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> When http/2 support lands in haproxy, will http/2 support also be
> required on the back end to take advantage of it?
To add to what CJ Ess said, I'd mention that the real gains of HTTP/2
are between the client and the first point in
http/2 takes how web sites have been architected for the last decade and
turns it upside down, so I suspect it will take a while to really take
hold. On haproxy's roadmap http/2 is in the uncategorized section. =P Also
many people think that the TLS overhead that browsers have forced on http/2
wast
When http/2 support lands in haproxy, will http/2 support also be
required on the back end to take advantage of it?
I'm hoping that I can leverage http/2 without immediate support on the
back end. I would expect that the LAN connection between haproxy and
the back end servers will be fast enough
5 matches
Mail list logo
