On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:10:55PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:30:12PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 07:50:56AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:29:26AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > > Hello,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:30:12PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 07:50:56AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:29:26AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Is it currently possible to pass "HTTP CONNECT" requests dire
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 07:50:56AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:29:26AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is it currently possible to pass "HTTP CONNECT" requests directly to the
> > backend server?
> >
> > So haproxy itself shouldn't try to co
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:29:26AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it currently possible to pass "HTTP CONNECT" requests directly to the
> backend server?
>
> So haproxy itself shouldn't try to connect anywhere, but instead directly pass
> the request to the backend, and let b
Hello,
Is it currently possible to pass "HTTP CONNECT" requests directly to the
backend server?
So haproxy itself shouldn't try to connect anywhere, but instead directly pass
the request to the backend, and let backend handle it.
I know this can be achieved in TCP/raw mode (obviously), but some
5 matches
Mail list logo