instance of
> haproxy to be ready. Is there any High Availability solution for haproxy
> itself?
>
> Regards,
> Jiafan
>
>
>
7 8:32 AM
To: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: High Availability for haproxy itself
Am 02.06.17 um 11:35 schrieb Raphaël Enrici:
> Hi,
>
> if you are in a simple case where you only need some kind of active/passive
> solution without big scaling needs on a
> Linux system, look for &
écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Haproxy ensures the HA for real servers such as httpd. However, in the
>> case of haproxy itself, if it fails, then it requires another instance
>> of haproxy to be ready. Is there any High Availability solution for
>> haproxy itself?
>>
roxy to be ready. Is there any High Availability solution for
haproxy itself?
Regards,
Jiafan
lity
>
> HTH,
> Raph
>
>
> Le 2017-06-02 10:34, Jiafan Zhou a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Haproxy ensures the HA for real servers such as httpd. However, in the
>> case of haproxy itself, if it fails, then it requires another instance
>> of haproxy to be
t requires another instance
of haproxy to be ready. Is there any High Availability solution for
haproxy itself?
Regards,
Jiafan
From: jiafan.z...@ericsson.com
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:34:56 +0100
Subject: High Availability for haproxy itself
> Hi,
>
> Haproxy ensures the HA for real servers such as httpd. However, in
> the case of haproxy itself, if it fails, then it requires another
> instance of hapr
Hi,
Haproxy ensures the HA for real servers such as httpd. However, in the
case of haproxy itself, if it fails, then it requires another instance
of haproxy to be ready. Is there any High Availability solution for
haproxy itself?
Regards,
Jiafan
8 matches
Mail list logo
