Re: Now a Working Patchset (was: Re: Patch proposal for FEATURE/MAJOR: Add upstream-proxy-tunnel feature)

On Thu, 6 Jun 2024, at 22:57, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Hi. > > I was able to create a working setup with the attached patches, I'm > pretty sure > that the patch will need some adoptions until it' ready to commit to > the dev branch. > > It would be nice to get some feedback. Hi Alex, This is

Now a Working Patchset (was: Re: Patch proposal for FEATURE/MAJOR: Add upstream-proxy-tunnel feature)

Hi. I was able to create a working setup with the attached patches, I'm pretty sure that the patch will need some adoptions until it' ready to commit to the dev branch. It would be nice to get some feedback. There are some open questions which I'm not able to do by my self because it require

Re: Patch proposal for FEATURE/MAJOR: Add upstream-proxy-tunnel feature

Hi. Anyone who have some Ideas how to fix the return way? Regards Alex On 2024-05-27 (Mo.) 09:12, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: Hi. I have done some progress with the feature :-) The test setup runs in 4 shells. # shell1: curl -vk --connect-to www.test1.com:4433:127.0.0.1:8080 -H "Host: www.tes

Patch proposal for FEATURE/MAJOR: Add upstream-proxy-tunnel feature (was: Re: Maybe stupid question but can HAProxy now use a upstream proxy)

Hi. I have done some progress with the feature :-) The test setup runs in 4 shells. # shell1: curl -vk --connect-to www.test1.com:4433:127.0.0.1:8080 -H "Host: www.test1.com" https://www.test1.com:4433 # shell2: ./haproxy -d -f examples/upstream-proxy.cfg # shell3: sudo podman run --rm -it --