Re: Performance implications of using dynamic maps

On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:46:07PM +0530, Sachin Shetty wrote: > Thanks willy, I need to do more than just pick a backend. So you feel even > with a map of 10K keys, multiple look ups should be ok? Sure. Fetching the header is more expensive than performing a lookup in a binary tree of "only" 10k

Re: Performance implications of using dynamic maps

Thanks willy, I need to do more than just pick a backend. So you feel even with a map of 10K keys, multiple look ups should be ok? Thanks Sachin On 12/8/14 6:15 PM, "Willy Tarreau" wrote: >Hi Sachin, > >On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 06:04:35PM +0530, Sachin Shetty wrote: >> Hi Willy, >> >> I need on

Re: Performance implications of using dynamic maps

Hi Sachin, On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 06:04:35PM +0530, Sachin Shetty wrote: > Hi Willy, > > I need one more clarification, I need the value in multiple acls > > acl is_a_v-1 hdr(host),map(/opt/haproxy/current/conf/proxy.map) a_v-1 > > acl is_a_v-2 hdr(host),map(/opt/haproxy/current/conf/proxy.map

Re: Performance implications of using dynamic maps

Hi Willy, I need one more clarification, I need the value in multiple acls acl is_a_v-1 hdr(host),map(/opt/haproxy/current/conf/proxy.map) a_v-1 acl is_a_v-2 hdr(host),map(/opt/haproxy/current/conf/proxy.map) a_v-2 acl is_a_v-3 hdr(host),map(/opt/haproxy/current/conf/proxy.map) a_v-3 .. .. acl

Re: Performance implications of using dynamic maps

Thanks a lot Willy. Yes, I tried my luck with sticky tables, but could not find a way to store key value mapping for 1000s of host names. I will move this to testing, thanks for you help as always :) Thanks Sachin On 12/2/14 1:01 PM, "Willy Tarreau" wrote: >Hi Sachin, > >On Sat, Nov 29, 2014

Re: Performance implications of using dynamic maps

Hi Sachin, On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 04:19:54PM +0530, Sachin Shetty wrote: > Hi, > > In our architecture, we have thousands of host names resolving to a single > haproxy, we dynamically decide a sticky backend based on our own custom > sharding. To determine the shard info, we let the request flow

Performance implications of using dynamic maps

Hi, In our architecture, we have thousands of host names resolving to a single haproxy, we dynamically decide a sticky backend based on our own custom sharding. To determine the shard info, we let the request flow in to a default apache proxy that processes the requests and also responds with th