On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
OK so here are a few results of haproxy 1.4.8 running on Atom D510 (64-bit)
without keep-alive :
6400 hits/s on 0-bytes objets
6200 hits/s on 1kB objects (86 Mbps)
5700 hits/s on 2kB objects (130 Mbps)
5250 hits/s on 4kB
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 02:58:56PM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
Quick tests with keep-alive enabled report 7400 hits/s instead of 6400
for the empty file test, and 600 instead of 5250 for the 4kB file, thus
minor savings.
hi Willy, are you talking about 6000 (6000 instead of 5250)? or
Thank you so much for the information Willy.
unai
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:23:59AM +0800, Unai Rodriguez wrote:
Dear All,
I am thinking of setting an HAProxy on Atom D510 Dual Core 1.66GHz. Am
I supposed to face performance
Hi Unai,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:23:59AM +0800, Unai Rodriguez wrote:
Dear All,
I am thinking of setting an HAProxy on Atom D510 Dual Core 1.66GHz. Am
I supposed to face performance issues? Anyone got experience with
HAProxy running on similar hardware? Would it be possible to share
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:23:59AM +0800, Unai Rodriguez wrote:
Dear All,
I am thinking of setting an HAProxy on Atom D510 Dual Core 1.66GHz. Am
I supposed to face performance issues? Anyone got experience with
HAProxy running on similar hardware? Would it be possible to share
some
5 matches
Mail list logo