On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Chris Allen ch...@cjx.com wrote:
We're running haproxy on a 2x4 core Intel E5-2609 box. At present haproxy is
running on
a single core and saturating that core at about 15,000 requests per second.
Our application has four distinct front-ends (listening on four
On 29 October 2014 08:52, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Chris Allen ch...@cjx.com wrote:
We're running haproxy on a 2x4 core Intel E5-2609 box. At present
haproxy is
running on
a single core and saturating that core at about 15,000 requests per
second.
If a backend is used only by 1 FE and that FE is bound to a certain CPU(s),
do we still need to bind the backend to the same CPU(s) set ?
Cheers,
Pavlos
Yes, this is a requirement and will be performed by HAProxy automatically.
Baptiste
On 29 October 2014 13:49, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
If a backend is used only by 1 FE and that FE is bound to a certain
CPU(s),
do we still need to bind the backend to the same CPU(s) set ?
Cheers,
Pavlos
Yes, this is a requirement and will be performed by HAProxy
Hey Chris,
we've been running haproxy with nbproc 12 for quite a while now and it
works great for us. We haven't even gotten around to tying interrupts to
certain cores, works pretty well without. No need for multiple config
files either.
Cheers,
Conrad
On 10/27/2014 07:41 PM, Chris Allen
5 matches
Mail list logo