On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:50:48AM +0100, Baptiste wrote:
> That said, I may have found something in accurate. We'll discuss about
> it tomorrow in the office.
OK.
> > BTW, maybe we should provide this cmd line option, then it will be possible
> > to state that a service reload maintain the state
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Baptiste,
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 09:01:27PM +0100, Baptiste wrote:
>> I commented this case in the code:
>>
>> /* apply drain mode if server is currently enabled */
>> if (!(srv->admin & SRV_ADMF_FMAINT) && (srv_admin_state & SRV_ADM
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Baptiste wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:32:14AM +0200, Alex wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the answer, this is very helpful.
>>> So to sum up my understanding, usually drain is use
Hi Baptiste,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 09:01:27PM +0100, Baptiste wrote:
> I commented this case in the code:
>
> /* apply drain mode if server is currently enabled */
> if (!(srv->admin & SRV_ADMF_FMAINT) && (srv_admin_state & SRV_ADMF_FDRAIN)) {
> /* The SRV_ADMF_FDRAIN flag is inherited
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:32:14AM +0200, Alex wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for the answer, this is very helpful.
>> So to sum up my understanding, usually drain is used in operations by
>> setting the server in this state for
Hi Alex,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:32:14AM +0200, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the answer, this is very helpful.
> So to sum up my understanding, usually drain is used in operations by
> setting the server in this state for a specific amount of time and then put
> in maintenance state. So
Hi,
Thank you for the answer, this is very helpful.
So to sum up my understanding, usually drain is used in operations by
setting the server in this state for a specific amount of time and then put
in maintenance state. So:
1. If I have an automated operation process which sets a server state to
Hello,
I've found another difference - regarding "seamless server states",
according to my testing using version 1.6.3 administrative state DRAIN is
not preserved after a reload but set weight 0 is preserved.
For my use case, using DRAIN seems the logical choice but because of the 2
issues that I
Hi Baptiste,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Baptiste wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Igor Cicimov
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Alex wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I was testing haproxy version 1.6.3 and I am a bit confused regarding
> >> draining a serv
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Igor Cicimov
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Alex wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was testing haproxy version 1.6.3 and I am a bit confused regarding
>> draining a server.
>>
>> According to the documentation:
>> set server / state [ ready | drain | main
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Alex wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was testing haproxy version 1.6.3 and I am a bit confused regarding
> draining a server.
>
> According to the documentation:
> set server / state [ ready | drain | maint ]
> [...] Setting the mode to "drain" only removes the server from
Hello,
I was testing haproxy version 1.6.3 and I am a bit confused regarding
draining a server.
According to the documentation:
set server / state [ ready | drain | maint ]
[...] Setting the mode to "drain" only removes the server from load
balancing but still allows it to be checked and to accep
12 matches
Mail list logo
