On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:42:18PM -0800, Maciej Katafiasz wrote:
> On 9 February 2016 at 23:24, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > I've got this request about 10 years ago, I wanted to implement a server
> > option called "expect-down", then some users suggested that it could also
> > be convenient to have
On 9 February 2016 at 23:24, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I've got this request about 10 years ago, I wanted to implement a server
> option called "expect-down", then some users suggested that it could also
> be convenient to have a "start-down" option which would not mark the
> servers up by default an
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 01:59:40PM -0800, Maciej Katafiasz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In our deployment we sometimes spin up a HAProxy container
> simultaneously with backends, and since they're registered the moment
> a container is spawned, they will be added to rotation immediately,
> before the pro
Hi,
In our deployment we sometimes spin up a HAProxy container
simultaneously with backends, and since they're registered the moment
a container is spawned, they will be added to rotation immediately,
before the process inside had a chance to start up. Because HAProxy
starts up much faster, this i
4 matches
Mail list logo