Re: Varnish vs HAProxy vs Nginx vs Squid vs Other

2010-07-06 Thread Angelo Höngens
On 6-7-2010 20:28, Angelo Höngens wrote: > We use haproxy for balancing, because in my opinion it's best at > balancing. We use squid for balancing and ssl offloading, and varnish > for high-volume caching. reply-to-self: I meant squid/varnish for *caching* -- With kind regards, Angelo Hön

Re: Varnish vs HAProxy vs Nginx vs Squid vs Other

2010-07-06 Thread Angelo Höngens
On 6-7-2010 18:07, Christian Jensen wrote: > Hi guys, > > I am biasing towards HAProxy but as the comparison shopper that I am, I > am looking to make sure that is the right choice. > > Does anyone have a URL to a feature comparison chart to compare a bunch > of different Load Balancers/Proxies?

Varnish vs HAProxy vs Nginx vs Squid vs Other

2010-07-06 Thread Christian Jensen
Hi guys, I am biasing towards HAProxy but as the comparison shopper that I am, I am looking to make sure that is the right choice. Does anyone have a URL to a feature comparison chart to compare a bunch of different Load Balancers/Proxies? Sounds like a great wikipedia article to me. Than