Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

t have haproxy load balanced w/ >> keepalive or pacemaker or something along those lines. >> >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> --Rich >> ---------- >> *From:* Bryan Talbot >> *Sent:* Thursday, August 20, 2015 4:27 PM >> *To:* Rich Vig

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

ve haproxy load balanced w/ > keepalive or pacemaker or something along those lines. > > > Thanks in advance, > > --Rich > -- > *From:* Bryan Talbot > *Sent:* Thursday, August 20, 2015 4:27 PM > *To:* Rich Vigorito > *Cc:* Bryan Talbot; B

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Rich Vigorito wrote: > Reading this: > http://blog.haproxy.com/2012/06/05/preserve-source-ip-address-despite-reverse-proxies/​ > about PROXY protocol, what needs to happen for PROXY protocol to be > recognized by the web server? > The webserver needs to support it

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

! From: Bryan Talbot Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 2:16 PM To: Rich Vigorito Cc: Baptiste; HAProxy Subject: Re: getting transparent proxy to work. On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Rich Vigorito mailto:ri...@ocp.org>> wrote: I should also clarify the goal of using this approach was to

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Rich Vigorito wrote: > I should also clarify the goal of using this approach was to do TLS from > router to haproxy and onto webservers but to preserve the client IP. The > other thought I had was to SSL terminate on haproxy box and initiate new > TLS handshake fr

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Rich Vigorito wrote: > After changing the default gateway of the web servers to 10.10.130.79 this > didnt fix it. The site we were testing on, and then all the other sites as > well were unresponsive. So what I was unclear on is if we changed the default > gatew

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

, August 18, 2015 9:19 AM To: Baptiste Cc: HAProxy Subject: Re: getting transparent proxy to work. After changing the default gateway of the web servers to 10.10.130.79 this didnt fix it. The site we were testing on, and then all the other sites as well were unresponsive. So what I was unclear on

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

network topology and the other being what me and the >>> > network admin though was happening in our TCP handshake. This was >>> > determined >>> > by loading a tcpdump into wireshark. Those 2 files are dump.pcap (Which >>> > was >

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

hrough the > 2 web servers. Our web servers serve multiple sites, how to accommodate this? > Ie couldnt have 5 different IPs in the loopback? > > From: Baptiste > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 11:41 PM > To: Rich Vigorito > Cc: HAProxy

RE: getting transparent proxy to work.

e loopback? From: Baptiste Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 11:41 PM To: Rich Vigorito Cc: HAProxy Subject: Re: getting transparent proxy to work. Hi Rich, so here is your problem. Please temporarily change this default gateway of the web servers to the active VIP: 10

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

> > The only difference between the 2 tests is removing: >> > >> > source 0.0.0.0 usesrc clientip >> > >> > Removing it loadbalancing works, keeping it in the config, load >> > balancing doesnt work >> > >> > -Rich >> > __

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

nt work > > -Rich > > From: Rich Vigorito mailto:ri...@ocp.org>> > Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 5:22 PM > To: Baptiste > Cc: haproxy@formilux.org<mailto:haproxy@formilux.org> > Subject: RE: getting transparent proxy to work

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

; Removing it loadbalancing works, keeping it in the config, load > balancing doesnt work > > > > -Rich > > > > From: Rich Vigorito > > Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 5:22 PM > > To: Baptiste > > Cc: haproxy@formilux.org > > Subject:

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

aptiste > Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 8:38 AM > To: Rich Vigorito > Cc: haproxy@formilux.org > Subject: Re: getting transparent proxy to work. > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Rich Vigorito wrote: >> Hello, this is my first time using the mailing list. I have the fol

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

> From: Rich Vigorito > Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 5:22 PM > To: Baptiste > Cc: haproxy@formilux.org > Subject: RE: getting transparent proxy to work. > > Thanks you very much for all the help, and yes, you were correct about the > capture i reported being the h

RE: getting transparent proxy to work.

From: Rich Vigorito Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 5:22 PM To: Baptiste Cc: haproxy@formilux.org Subject: RE: getting transparent proxy to work. Thanks you very much for all the help, and yes, you were correct about the capture i reported being the health check. attached are 2 pngs. one w/ our

Re: getting transparent proxy to work.

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Rich Vigorito wrote: > Hello, this is my first time using the mailing list. I have the following > issue. > > > Followed steps to enable transparent proxy outlined here: > > Howto transparent proxying and binding with HAProxy and ALOHA Load-Balancer > | HAProxy Tec

getting transparent proxy to work.

Hello, this is my first time using the mailing list. I have the following issue. Followed steps to enable transparent proxy outlined here: Howto transparent proxying and binding with HAProxy and ALOHA Load-Balancer | HAProxy Technologies - Aloha Load Balancer