Re: haproxy-1.8.0, sending a email-alert causes 100% cpu usage, FreeBSD 11.1

2017-11-28 Thread PiBa-NL
Hi Christopher / Willy, On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:28:20AM +0100, Christopher Faulet wrote: Here is a patch that should fix the deadlock. Could you confirm it fixes your bug ? Fix confirmed. Thanks, PiBa-NL / Pieter

Re: haproxy-1.8.0, sending a email-alert causes 100% cpu usage, FreeBSD 11.1

2017-11-28 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Christopher, On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:28:20AM +0100, Christopher Faulet wrote: > Here is a patch that should fix the deadlock. Could you confirm it fixes > your bug ? At least it works for me, previously a config with a mailer would immediately go to 100% CPU once reporting a down backend,

Re: haproxy-1.8.0, sending a email-alert causes 100% cpu usage, FreeBSD 11.1

2017-11-28 Thread Christopher Faulet
Le 28/11/2017 à 07:25, Willy Tarreau a écrit : Hi Pieter, On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:43:52PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote: Hi List, I thought i 'reasonably' tested some of 1.8.0's options. Today i put it into 'production' on my secondary cluster node and notice it takes 100% cpu... G.. bad.

Re: haproxy-1.8.0, sending a email-alert causes 100% cpu usage, FreeBSD 11.1

2017-11-27 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Pieter, On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:43:52PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote: > Hi List, > > I thought i 'reasonably' tested some of 1.8.0's options. > Today i put it into 'production' on my secondary cluster node and notice it > takes 100% cpu... G.. bad. This sounds like another case of recursive

haproxy-1.8.0, sending a email-alert causes 100% cpu usage, FreeBSD 11.1

2017-11-27 Thread PiBa-NL
Hi List, I thought i 'reasonably' tested some of 1.8.0's options. Today i put it into 'production' on my secondary cluster node and notice it takes 100% cpu... I guess i should have tried such a thing last week. My regular config with 10 frontends and total 13 servers seems to startup fine