haproxy logs :)
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:23 AM, hapr...@serverphorums.com wrote:
You mean haproxy logs or backend web server (apache/nginx logs) ?
---
posted at http://www.serverphorums.com
http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?10,447870,447964#msg-447964
K enabled logging in haproxy but even more confused
i think i had a misconfiguration the problem my www_backend had incorrect conn
rate limit set as 200bytes
acl DATARATE_ABUSER sc2_bytes_out_rate gt 200
instead of
acl DATARATE_ABUSER sc2_bytes_out_rate gt 2000
but in either case
Hi,
Le 18/02/2012 12:52, hapr...@serverphorums.com a écrit :
but in either case once rate was corrected, with or without acl in place,
/forums/images/i.png still bypassed stick-tables ?
I don't understand.
I've played with the configuration you provided (without any defaults
section btw),
looks like problem was with forward slashes match
acl imagepath path_beg /images/
acl imagepathforums path_beg /forums/images/
use_backend imagepath_backend if imagepath or imagepathforums
doesn't work
acl imagepath path_beg /images
acl imagepathforums path_beg /forums/images
use_backend
Reading up on 2 blog posts regarding DDOS protection via haproxy stick-tables
http://blog.serverfault.com/2010/08/26/1016491873/
http://blog.exceliance.fr/2011/08/25/protect-apache-against-apache-killer-script/
Problem
i tried testing this on my local test server with haproxy v1.5 dev7. But it
Hi,
In both cases, what does the log lines says about the backend used?
I thought it could be related to the functions available depending on
the network level.
I mean that the acl path* are layer 7 functions while the tcp-request
content is layer 4 only.
When you enable the acl you moved up to
6 matches
Mail list logo
