Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:45:27AM +0200, Daniel Schneller wrote:
> If I read the patch correctly, even though it is classified as "MINOR" it
> will fail with an error on startup, when the configuration has a value
> outside the range.
> When backporting into the stable branches, this c
Hi!
Phew, I was following this one with some concern, fearing it could be something
more serious just waiting to hit us, too ;-)
Great that the issue was found, thanks for that!
There is just one thing I wanted to note regarding
> […] It can be backported in 1.7, 1.6 and 1.5. I finally marked t
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 05:00:01PM +0200, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> I attached a patch to improve the configuration parsing and to update the
> documentation. It can be backported in 1.7, 1.6 and 1.5. I finally marked
> this patch as a bug fix.
Applied, thanks to both of your for killing this on
Le 13/06/2017 à 14:16, Christopher Faulet a écrit :
Le 13/06/2017 à 10:31, siclesang a écrit :
haproxy balances by host,but often captures a part of request header
host or null, and requests balance to default server.
how to debug it ,
Hi,
I'll try to help you. Can you share your configu
Le 13/06/2017 à 10:31, siclesang a écrit :
haproxy balances by host,but often captures a part of request header
host or null, and requests balance to default server.
how to debug it ,
Hi,
I'll try to help you. Can you share your configuration please ? It could
help to find a potential b
haproxy balances by host,but often captures a part of request header host or
null, and requests balance to default server.
how to debug it ,
thinks
strace.log:
15:48:48.826818 setsockopt(12, SOL_SOCKET, SO_LINGER, {onoff=1, linger=0}, 8) =
0 <0.23>
15:48:48.826881 close(12)
strace.log:
15:48:48.826818 setsockopt(12, SOL_SOCKET, SO_LINGER, {onoff=1, linger=0}, 8) =
0 <0.23>
15:48:48.826881 close(12) = 0 <0.37>
15:48:48.826968 epoll_wait(3, {{EPOLLIN, {u32=8, u64=8}}}, 500, 68) = 1
<0.048443>
15:48:48.875473 accept4(8, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_p
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:15:56AM +0800, siclesang wrote:
> i am sorry
> -d output
> 954722 000513c:.accept(0008)=000a from [10.201.10.11:10037]
> 954723 000513c:.clihdr[000a:] POST /coupon/show/a511 HTTP/1.1
> 954724 000513c:.clihdr[000a:] Connection: keep-alive
> 9547
i am sorry
-d output
954722 000513c:.accept(0008)=000a from [10.201.10.11:10037]
954723 000513c:.clihdr[000a:] POST /coupon/show/a511 HTTP/1.1
954724 000513c:.clihdr[000a:] Connection: keep-alive
954725 000513c:.clihdr[000a:] ent-Type: application/x-www-form-
i am sorry
-d output
954722 000513c:.accept(0008)=000a from [10.201.10.11:10037]
954723 000513c:.clihdr[000a:] POST /coupon/show/a511 HTTP/1.1
954724 000513c:.clihdr[000a:] Connection: keep-alive
954725 000513c:.clihdr[000a:] ent-Type: application/x-www-form-
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:13:40AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi siclesang.
>
> siclesang have written on Mon, 22 May 2017 11:11:31 +0800 (CST):
>
> > hi
> > i have a problem:haproxy does not capture the complete request
> > header host sometimes
>
> Which header do you miss?
> How long
Hi siclesang.
siclesang have written on Mon, 22 May 2017 11:11:31 +0800 (CST):
> hi
> i have a problem:haproxy does not capture the complete request
> header host sometimes
Which header do you miss?
How long is the header?
> i run haroxpy with -d for some time
>
> haproxy -vv
> HA-Proxy ve
12 matches
Mail list logo
