On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 08:23:04AM +0530, Jai Gupta wrote:
> > > > What hash should we use in this case or is there any other
> configuration
> > > > that we should be using?
> > >
> > > It's totally irrelevant to the hash here, because the
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 08:23:04AM +0530, Jai Gupta wrote:
> > > What hash should we use in this case or is there any other configuration
> > > that we should be using?
> >
> > It's totally irrelevant to the hash here, because the hash is determinist
> > so it ensures that a given input always lead
Thank for reply Willy.
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:54:18PM +0530, Jai Gupta wrote:
> > We have configured haproxy 1.5 and are using map-based hash (default).
> >
> > For e.g. we have two backend servers. Server A and Server B.
> > Clients 1
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:54:18PM +0530, Jai Gupta wrote:
> We have configured haproxy 1.5 and are using map-based hash (default).
>
> For e.g. we have two backend servers. Server A and Server B.
> Clients 1,2,3,4,5 will go to same backend.
>
> For example
> Client 1,2,3 are connected to Server
We have configured haproxy 1.5 and are using map-based hash (default).
For e.g. we have two backend servers. Server A and Server B.
Clients 1,2,3,4,5 will go to same backend.
For example
Client 1,2,3 are connected to Server A as per hash.
Server A is crashed.
haproxy shifts clients to Server B.
S
5 matches
Mail list logo