Hello,
Le 23/07/2020 à 14:34, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
Hi Arnall,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 01:27:31PM +0200, Arnall wrote:
Hello everyone,
I remember that in the past it was strongly discouraged to use http-reuse in
combination with send-proxy, because of the client IP which is provided by
the
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 01:47:44PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 at 13:14, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > However on a unix domain socket like this we never had this issue in
> > > the first place, as connection-reuse cannot be used on it by
> > > definition, correct?
> >
> > No,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 at 13:14, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > However on a unix domain socket like this we never had this issue in
> > the first place, as connection-reuse cannot be used on it by
> > definition, correct?
>
> No, it doesn't change anything. We consider the connection, the protocol
>
Hi Lukas,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:58:29PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 14:34, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > defaults
> > > http-reuse always
> > >
> > > backend abuse
> > > timeout server 60s
> > > balance roundrobin
> > > hash-balance-factor
Hello,
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 14:34, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > defaults
> > http-reuse always
> >
> > backend abuse
> > timeout server 60s
> > balance roundrobin
> > hash-balance-factor 0
> > server s_abuse u...@abuse.sock send-proxy-v2 maxconn 4
> >
> > listen l_abuse
> >
Hi Arnall,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 01:27:31PM +0200, Arnall wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I remember that in the past it was strongly discouraged to use http-reuse in
> combination with send-proxy, because of the client IP which is provided by
> the proxy protocol.
>
> I have this configuration
Hello everyone,
I remember that in the past it was strongly discouraged to use
http-reuse in combination with send-proxy, because of the client IP
which is provided by the proxy protocol.
I have this configuration :
HA-Proxy version 2.0.14-1~bpo9+1 2020/04/16 - https://haproxy.org/
Le 03/01/2017 à 18:18, Lukas Tribus a écrit :
Hi Arnall,
Am 03.01.2017 um 16:15 schrieb Arnall:
Is it possible that with "http-reuse always" the yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy
request has used
the xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx connection between https and http frontend with
proxy
protocol forwarding xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 06:18:23PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hi Arnall,
>
>
> Am 03.01.2017 um 16:15 schrieb Arnall:
> >
> > Is it possible that with "http-reuse always" the yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy request
> > has used
> > the xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx connection between https and http frontend with proxy
> >
Hi Arnall,
Am 03.01.2017 um 16:15 schrieb Arnall:
Is it possible that with "http-reuse always" the yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy
request has used
the xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx connection between https and http frontend with proxy
protocol forwarding xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx instead of yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy ?
Yes, that's what
Hi everyone,
recently we have separated https and http frontend in order to scale well.
we are using a nbproc > 1 configuration for ssl offloading :
listen web_tls
mode http
bind *:443 ssl crt whatever.pem process 2
bind *:443 ssl crt whatever.pem process 3
../..
server
11 matches
Mail list logo