Re: maxsslconn vs maxsslrate

On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 02:47:01PM +0530, Mihir Shirali wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > I have looked at the link. What I am looking for is an answer to the > difference between maxsslconn and maxsslrate. The former does not result in > CPU savings while the latter does. That's expected : - the

Re: maxsslconn vs maxsslrate

Hi Mihir. On 07/06/2018 14:47, Mihir Shirali wrote: Hi Alexander, I have looked at the link. What I am looking for is an answer to the difference between maxsslconn and maxsslrate. The former does not result in CPU savings while the latter does. Again the former does result in large number of

Re: maxsslconn vs maxsslrate

Hi Alexander, I have looked at the link. What I am looking for is an answer to the difference between maxsslconn and maxsslrate. The former does not result in CPU savings while the latter does. Again the former does result in large number of tcp connection resets while the latter does not. What

Re: maxsslconn vs maxsslrate

We have a large number of ip phones connecting to this port. They could be as large as 80k. They request for a file from a custom application. haproxy front ends the tls connection and then forwards the request to the application's http port. HA-Proxy version 1.8.8 2018/04/19 Copyright 2000-2018

Re: maxsslconn vs maxsslrate

Hi Mihir. On 07/06/2018 10:27, Mihir Shirali wrote: Hi Team, We use haproxy to front tls for a large number of endpoints, haproxy prcesses the TLS session and then forwards the request to the backend application. What we have noticed is that if there are a large number of connections from

maxsslconn vs maxsslrate

Hi Team, We use haproxy to front tls for a large number of endpoints, haproxy prcesses the TLS session and then forwards the request to the backend application. What we have noticed is that if there are a large number of connections from different clients - the CPU usage goes up significantly.