Lukas Tribus wrote:
[dd]
>
> > It would be nice however to understand minconn/fullconn too. If a
> > backend has several servers with identical minconn, maxconn and weight,
> > what's the point of having minconn? The load will be always distributed
> > evenly between all the servers notwithstand
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 05:31, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> Lukas Tribus wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 16:55, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > >
> > > I can even phrase my question in simpler terms. What happens if the sum
> > > total of all servers' maxconns in a backend is less than the maxconn
>
Lukas Tribus wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 16:55, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> >
> > I can even phrase my question in simpler terms. What happens if the sum
> > total of all servers' maxconns in a backend is less than the maxconn
> > value in the frontend pointing to the said backend?
>
> Queuein
Hello Victor,
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 16:55, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> I can even phrase my question in simpler terms. What happens if the sum
> total of all servers' maxconns in a backend is less than the maxconn
> value in the frontend pointing to the said backend?
Queueing for "timeout queue"
I can even phrase my question in simpler terms. What happens if the sum
total of all servers' maxconns in a backend is less than the maxconn
value in the frontend pointing to the said backend?
Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> The dynamic limit is probably one of the darker sides of Ha
Dear Colleagues,
The dynamic limit is probably one of the darker sides of Haproxy
configuration. One of the best explanations I've found is
https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg04782.html
but still I'm missing some points.
Consider the following configuration:
===
6 matches
Mail list logo
