On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 08:29:35AM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> Willy, could you merge this patch please?
Now done, thanks guys,
Willy
On 6/20/19 1:02 PM, William Dauchy wrote:
Hi Fred,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 09:44:51AM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
In fact it seems I have broken something and missed this case.
Here is a patch which should fix this issue.
Thanks for the patch, it fixes the issue.
From 1575a4bcdb52bbb86
Hi Fred,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 09:44:51AM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> In fact it seems I have broken something and missed this case.
> Here is a patch which should fix this issue.
Thanks for the patch, it fixes the issue.
> From 1575a4bcdb52bbb8604521b6673557c178431deb Mon Sep 17 00:00:0
On 6/20/19 12:59 AM, William Dauchy wrote:
Hello,
Hello William,
We are using "rate limiting" config such as the one mentioned below:
backend foo
stick-table type ip size 200k expire 30s store conn_rate(60s)
tcp-request content track-sc1 src
http-request deny deny_status 429 i
Hello,
We are using "rate limiting" config such as the one mentioned below:
backend foo
stick-table type ip size 200k expire 30s store conn_rate(60s)
tcp-request content track-sc1 src
http-request deny deny_status 429 if { src_conn_rate ge 42000 }
While giving a try to v2.0 we are ge
5 matches
Mail list logo