Re: no-stop keyword proposal

2021-07-27 Thread Joao Morais
> Em 27 de jul. de 2021, à(s) 10:03, William Lallemand > escreveu: > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:18:18PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote: >> >> Regarding the use case: I need the ability to reach a stopping, but >> still running haproxy instance to, at least: >> [...] >> > > This is already poss

Re: no-stop keyword proposal

2021-07-27 Thread William Lallemand
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:18:18PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote: > Subject: no-stop keyword proposal > > > Hello list, the diff below is a proposal to add a bind keyword used to > flag LI_O_NOSTOP option in the bind’s listener. > > Regarding the use case: I need the ability to

Re: no-stop keyword proposal

2021-07-20 Thread Joao Morais
> Em 20 de jul. de 2021, à(s) 14:17, Willy Tarreau escreveu: > > Hi Joao, > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:18:18PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote: >> >> Hello list, the diff below is a proposal to add a bind keyword used to flag >> LI_O_NOSTOP option in the bind's listener. >> >> Regarding the use

Re: no-stop keyword proposal

2021-07-20 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Joao, On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:18:18PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote: > > Hello list, the diff below is a proposal to add a bind keyword used to flag > LI_O_NOSTOP option in the bind's listener. > > Regarding the use case: I need the ability to reach a stopping, but still > running haproxy insta

no-stop keyword proposal

2021-07-20 Thread Joao Morais
Hello list, the diff below is a proposal to add a bind keyword used to flag LI_O_NOSTOP option in the bind’s listener. Regarding the use case: I need the ability to reach a stopping, but still running haproxy instance to, at least: 1) fairly distribute shutdown sessions of long running connec