> Em 27 de jul. de 2021, à(s) 10:03, William Lallemand
> escreveu:
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:18:18PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
>>
>> Regarding the use case: I need the ability to reach a stopping, but
>> still running haproxy instance to, at least:
>> [...]
>>
>
> This is already poss
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:18:18PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
> Subject: no-stop keyword proposal
>
>
> Hello list, the diff below is a proposal to add a bind keyword used to
> flag LI_O_NOSTOP option in the bind’s listener.
>
> Regarding the use case: I need the ability to
> Em 20 de jul. de 2021, à(s) 14:17, Willy Tarreau escreveu:
>
> Hi Joao,
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:18:18PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
>>
>> Hello list, the diff below is a proposal to add a bind keyword used to flag
>> LI_O_NOSTOP option in the bind's listener.
>>
>> Regarding the use
Hi Joao,
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:18:18PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
>
> Hello list, the diff below is a proposal to add a bind keyword used to flag
> LI_O_NOSTOP option in the bind's listener.
>
> Regarding the use case: I need the ability to reach a stopping, but still
> running haproxy insta
Hello list, the diff below is a proposal to add a bind keyword used to flag
LI_O_NOSTOP option in the bind’s listener.
Regarding the use case: I need the ability to reach a stopping, but still
running haproxy instance to, at least: 1) fairly distribute shutdown sessions
of long running connec
5 matches
Mail list logo