On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:34:08PM +0530, Amit Nigam wrote:
Hi Willy,
Thanks for your support, makes me believe I would solve this riddle.
After updating to 1.4.10, sync-ing TC2 and LB1 times thru NTP, and using
options tcp-smart-connect and tcp-smart-accept, I have seen significant
guillaume.bour...@gmail.com;
haproxy@formilux.org
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: node frequently goes down on another physical machine
Hi Amit,
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:24:55PM +0530, Amit Nigam wrote:
(...)
I see nothing wrong in your configs which could justify your issues
...@gobindas.in
Cc: Guillaume Bourque guillaume.bour...@gmail.com;
haproxy@formilux.org
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: node frequently goes down on another physical machine
Hi Amit,
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:24:55PM +0530, Amit Nigam wrote:
(...)
I see nothing wrong
Hi Amit,
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:24:55PM +0530, Amit Nigam wrote:
(...)
I see nothing wrong in your configs which could justify your issues.
Now in new stats page I noticed one thing which was not in 1.3.22 is
LastChk, but I wonder tc1 is showing L7OK/302 in 324ms _and tc2 is showing
Hi, We have just recently migrated from apache to HAProxy. We are having 2
tomcat(TC1 and TC2) nodes along with 2 LB(LB1 LB2) nodes and other DB nodes. We
created 4 virtual servers out of one physical server. Using 2 servers we have 8
nodes.
We are running two HAProxy instances on LB1 and LB2
Hi,
first upgrade to a more recent build of haproxy 1.4.x would be better.
Also you should send us more info of your hearbeat config and haproxy so
that we can understand better your setup.
Bye
Amit Nigam a écrit :
Hi, We have just recently migrated from apache to HAProxy. We are
having
6 matches
Mail list logo
