Re: v1.9.6+HEAD: segfault in h1_skip_chunk_crlf

2019-04-19 Thread Christopher Faulet
Le 19/04/2019 à 11:40, William Dauchy a écrit : Hi, On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 6:26 AM Willy Tarreau wrote: Good catch but in my opinion we should instead fix the called function (h1_skip_chunk_crlf). h1_skip_chunk_size() properly deals with the case where start==stop, but h1_skip_chunk_crlf() sa

Re: v1.9.6+HEAD: segfault in h1_skip_chunk_crlf

2019-04-19 Thread William Dauchy
Hi, On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 6:26 AM Willy Tarreau wrote: > Good catch but in my opinion we should instead fix the called function > (h1_skip_chunk_crlf). h1_skip_chunk_size() properly deals with the case > where start==stop, but h1_skip_chunk_crlf() says "If not enough data are > available, the f

Re: v1.9.6+HEAD: segfault in h1_skip_chunk_crlf

2019-04-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Christopher, On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 09:36:30PM +0200, Christopher Faulet wrote: > > It seems related to the last commits from Christopher Faulet, maybe > > around this commit: > > http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-1.9.git;a=commit;h=0c2973662163ab2753a54e729ecdb09dd694c2dd > > BUG/MINOR: mux-h

Re: v1.9.6+HEAD: segfault in h1_skip_chunk_crlf

2019-04-18 Thread Christopher Faulet
Le 18/04/2019 à 16:55, William Dauchy a écrit : Hello, We are triggering a segfault on the last HEAD of haproxy-1.9 tree, last commit being 1e0fd266db3e503783ff623faabcb1dfe211cb89 BUG/MINOR: mworker: disable busy polling in the master process backtrace: Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f73aeffd700 (LWP 1

v1.9.6+HEAD: segfault in h1_skip_chunk_crlf

2019-04-18 Thread William Dauchy
Hello, We are triggering a segfault on the last HEAD of haproxy-1.9 tree, last commit being 1e0fd266db3e503783ff623faabcb1dfe211cb89 BUG/MINOR: mworker: disable busy polling in the master process backtrace: Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f73aeffd700 (LWP 13044)): #0 h1_skip_chunk_crlf (stop=0, start=0, b