Le 19/04/2019 à 11:40, William Dauchy a écrit :
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 6:26 AM Willy Tarreau wrote:
Good catch but in my opinion we should instead fix the called function
(h1_skip_chunk_crlf). h1_skip_chunk_size() properly deals with the case
where start==stop, but h1_skip_chunk_crlf() sa
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 6:26 AM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Good catch but in my opinion we should instead fix the called function
> (h1_skip_chunk_crlf). h1_skip_chunk_size() properly deals with the case
> where start==stop, but h1_skip_chunk_crlf() says "If not enough data are
> available, the f
Hi Christopher,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 09:36:30PM +0200, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> > It seems related to the last commits from Christopher Faulet, maybe
> > around this commit:
> > http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-1.9.git;a=commit;h=0c2973662163ab2753a54e729ecdb09dd694c2dd
> > BUG/MINOR: mux-h
Le 18/04/2019 à 16:55, William Dauchy a écrit :
Hello,
We are triggering a segfault on the last HEAD of haproxy-1.9 tree, last
commit being
1e0fd266db3e503783ff623faabcb1dfe211cb89 BUG/MINOR: mworker: disable busy
polling in the master process
backtrace:
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f73aeffd700 (LWP 1
Hello,
We are triggering a segfault on the last HEAD of haproxy-1.9 tree, last
commit being
1e0fd266db3e503783ff623faabcb1dfe211cb89 BUG/MINOR: mworker: disable busy
polling in the master process
backtrace:
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f73aeffd700 (LWP 13044)):
#0 h1_skip_chunk_crlf (stop=0, start=0, b
5 matches
Mail list logo