Re: [Harbour] Asynchronous procedures

2008-02-03 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Feb 3, 2008 2:04 AM, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to consult on some fundamental thing of programming. This is a > topic of asynchronous vs. synchronous programing. Let's say I have a > code like this: [...] > Is there any way a single thread code to be a readable

[Harbour] Re: Version numbers suggestion

2008-02-03 Thread Alexander S.Kresin
On Saturday, February 02, 2008, 22:53 SzakĐąts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2) Recently the base workarea structure was changed in xHarbour. You >> know that every RDD have it's own workarea structure with first >> fields from a basic and some other, specific for this RDD, after the >> bas

Re: [Harbour] Version numbers suggestion

2008-02-03 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008, Alexander S.Kresin wrote: Hi Alexander, > Hi All, > it become more and more difficult for 3-rd party products developers > to fight with differences between Harbour and xHarbour and between > versions of the same compiler. > Just a couple of examples. ,--

Re: [Harbour] Asynchronous procedures

2008-02-03 Thread Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
Hi, In your shown code, even in 2nd version, oConn:Receive() is executed, only when state == 1 or so, but is executed. And you said it does not return until data is received. Eventually the same situation is created when state becomes 1. I've also said, that "server_proc() is called from som