Mindaugas,
> I still do not know the difference between SQL_VARCHAR and QL_NVARCHAR
In MS-SQL:
CHAR - Fixed length ASCII field (1 byte per character).
VARCHAR - Variable length ASCII field (1 byte per character).
NCHAR - Fixed length UNICODE field (2 bytes per character).
NVARCHAR - Variable len
Hello,
I try build harbour using win-make with bcc and VC2008 and have the next
error:
Fatal: Unable to open file 'KERNEL32.LIB'
win-make[3]: *** [hbpp.exe] Error 1
rm hbpp.obj
win-make[2]: *** [descend] Error 2
win-make[1]: *** [pp] Error 2
win-make: *** [source] Error 2
can any help me ??
Bes
+1 vote
2009/9/25 Itamar Lins
> Hi!
> My vote is for include LetoDb in contrib of harbour.
>
> Best regards,
> Itamar M. Lins Jr.
>
>
>
> ___
> Harbour mailing list
> Harbour@harbour-project.org
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbo
Hi!
My vote is for include LetoDb in contrib of harbour.
Best regards,
Itamar M. Lins Jr.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
> .. Przemek and Victor :)
s/Victor/Viktor, sorry
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Hi David,
>[ Other option is to rename os2/gcc to os2/gcc3
>and add new 4.x OMF support as os2/gcc. Depends
>on which one OS/2 users think is best to have
>as "default". ]
This lead immediatly to mantain two versions, gcc3 or gcc4, and is
inadequate. As Maurilio said, we are short of resource
For sure, there's a lot of interest for LETODB or similar RDD in harbour.
There is problem with project support, it seems Alexander is mainly unavailable.
It would be best to get feecback from author about this topic.
But, if he is unreachable, I don't see any obstacle (project license GPL v2)
Viktor:
Months ago, trying to use gcc4xx I collected many information and there
I "discovered" a.out/OMF choices
Below are some parts which come from 2005
David Macias
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:42:32 -0800
From: "Dave Yeo"
Subject: Re: a.out vs omf
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 08:41:44 +0930,
Build tests with (near) current Harbour
* $Id: ChangeLog 12604 2009-09-22 21:11:13Z snaiperis $
2009-09-23 00:13 UTC+0300 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas (dbtopas/at/dbtopas.lt)
build fine with gcc335
Build using Harbour sources "as is": a.out type
.dll files build fine
Strangely gcc335 report a warn
Viktor:
>To keep logic simple I'd rather suggest to
>introduce new compiler target os2/gcc4 and
>include all "OMF" stuff in there. I would
>only add new build switches if absolutely
>necessary and if it's generally useful for
>*all* targets.
>[ Other option is to rename os2/gcc to os2/gcc3
>and
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> Can you define "perhaps" here?
> What is the difference between the .exe and .wpi?
> (what is .wpi?)
>
an auto installer package, like .msi on win32
>> So in Harbour is enough
>> make install
>>
>> Is optional to select TCP/IP stack. For older one:
>> set HB_USER_CFLAGS
Actually just in recent days a Hungarian OS/2 user approached
me for help. All I could do is point him to this list and INSTALL
doc.
Care him carefully, perhaps is the last "Hungarian OS/2 user" :-)
Most probably :)
If there is anything more to say about OS/2/gcc build (like what
packages
>-Original Message-
>From: Antonio Carlos [mailto:toninho...@yahoo.com.br]
>Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 12:48 PM
>To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
>Subject: RE: [Harbour] Web Services in Harbour
>
>Thank you Marek.
>
>It works perfectly. In my case, I only need ws client, like
Do you have some comment/suggestion/action for my proposal ?
--
My proposal is to use and environmental variable to choose code in
gcc.mk and hbmk2.prg
Something like HB_OS2_TCP32 which was included to choose "tcp/ip
stack"
in OS/2
--
Perhaps
HB_
Hi
2009/9/25 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas :
> I'm not sure I understand you. What delays are you talking about? Do you
> want to say, that local DBFCDX test is so slow, that you have not waited
> until it was finished.
Locally DBFCDX - the speed I was quite happy (and I use it for local things)
But for
Thank you Marek.
It works perfectly. In my case, I only need ws client, like your sample.
BTW I read on the internet that SOAP was replaced by net framework. Will be so
good if we have an example how access ws via net framework too.
Thank you again,
Best regards,
Toninho.
--- Em sex, 25/9/
Viktor, Maurilio, Przemek:
Thanks for comments
> IMHO it will be good to create doc/os2howto.txt file to collect
>such information as David presented because it may be very useful in
>some farther developing saving the time.
>For beta tools and other non-mature / experimental stuff,
>doc/howtoo
Hi,
Shouldn't we add memory allocation functions which
are able to allocate memory of 64-bit size?
We have it: hb_xgrab() ;-)
In all platforms except Win64 'long' is large enough to hold pointer.
Over ten years ago looking at Win API I said that MS will have
horrible
problems introducing 64
Of course I can do it and will do it when I have time, I only would
like to see that it has established in Harbour. Basically, I don't
like the syntax, why was .ARCH. chosen, what do these dots mean, are
they somehow related to xBase syntax for logical values and
operators?
;) Are there any oth
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
> Shouldn't we add memory allocation functions which
> are able to allocate memory of 64-bit size?
We have it: hb_xgrab() ;-)
In all platforms except Win64 'long' is large enough to hold pointer.
Over ten years ago looking at Win API I said that MS
Hi,
The local disk tests in WinXP and Harbour using DBFCDX with native IO
took ~2.50 seconds. It means that in above test Harbour consumes less
then 1% and rest is the cost of network overhead.
but this test clearly shows that to reach real speed improvement it's
necessary to create RDD orient
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Phil Krylov wrote:
Hik,
> Of course I can do it and will do it when I have time, I only would
> like to see that it has established in Harbour. Basically, I don't
> like the syntax, why was .ARCH. chosen, what do these dots mean, are
> they somehow related to xBase syntax for
Hi,
I'm not sure I understand you. What delays are you talking about? Do you
want to say, that local DBFCDX test is so slow, that you have not waited
until it was finished.
I've asked the question about local DBFCDX speed, because of your results:
NETIO
locally (two processes)
adding 1
Viktor:
Actually just in recent days a Hungarian OS/2 user approached
me for help. All I could do is point him to this list and INSTALL doc.
Care him carefully, perhaps is the last "Hungarian OS/2 user" :-)
If there is anything more to say about OS/2/gcc build (like what
packages to downloa
Can I use in 7 parametr in dbUseArea() codepages when i open data via
SQLMIX ?
I try different CP :
* PL852
* PLISO
* PLMAZ
* PLWIN
Without change on screen :(
Regards,
Marek Horodyski
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.h
I think it's safe to use. It only improved compared
to the last beta3, which was also stable.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2009 Sep 25, at 10:24, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
I'd like to refresh my "stable" local branch ( now based on beta1
ChangeLog 11315 2009-06-12 ) to include -fpic fixes and so avoid
selinu
I'd like to refresh my "stable" local branch ( now based on beta1
ChangeLog 11315 2009-06-12 ) to include -fpic fixes and so avoid
selinux issues.
Comments about actual status of the svn?
best regards,
Lorenzo
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-pr
>-Original Message-
>From: ToninhoFWi [mailto:toninho...@yahoo.com.br]
>Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:46 PM
>To: harbour@harbour-project.org
>Subject: [Harbour] Web Services in Harbour
>
>Hi ppl,
>
>How I do to access web services in Harbour please ?
Toninho, pls. test this code
28 matches
Mail list logo
