Revision: 13168
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13168view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-12-08 12:39:32 + (Tue, 08 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-12-08 13:39 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbcairo/core.c
Hi,
2009-12-08 13:39 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbcairo/core.c
+ Enabled HB_USE_ITEM mode which doesn't use Harbour internals.
Viktor, I do not think this is a good commit before questions about GC
API are finally solved.
Regards,
Mindaugas
2009-12-08 13:39 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbcairo/core.c
+ Enabled HB_USE_ITEM mode which doesn't use Harbour internals.
Viktor, I do not think this is a good commit before questions about GC API
are finally solved.
As per Przemek's last commit, both
Hi,
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
2009-12-08 13:39 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbcairo/core.c
+ Enabled HB_USE_ITEM mode which doesn't use Harbour internals.
Viktor, I do not think this is a good commit before questions about GC API are
finally solved.
As per
2009-12-08 13:39 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbcairo/core.c
+ Enabled HB_USE_ITEM mode which doesn't use Harbour internals.
Viktor, I do not think this is a good commit before questions about GC API
are finally solved.
As per Przemek's last commit, both
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
I don't mind if a PHB_ITEM container is used if it makes sense, or makes
coding simpler or documented.
But it doesn't.
Emphasis (in this specific case) on 'documented'.
I want to see the second version (without extra item) working by default in
the final code, but
