Re: [Harbour] Version numbers suggestion

2008-02-03 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008, Alexander S.Kresin wrote: Hi Alexander, > Hi All, > it become more and more difficult for 3-rd party products developers > to fight with differences between Harbour and xHarbour and between > versions of the same compiler. > Just a couple of examples. ,--

Re: [Harbour] Version numbers suggestion

2008-02-02 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Alexander, 1) At() - hb_At() issue in Harbour. As a result now we have At() in xHarbour and in official Harbour distribution, which accept 4 parameters, At() in new Harbour code, which accepts only 2 and hb_At() in new Harbour, accepting 4 parameters, which is absent in xHarbour and in older

[Harbour] Version numbers suggestion

2008-02-02 Thread Alexander S.Kresin
Hi All, it become more and more difficult for 3-rd party products developers to fight with differences between Harbour and xHarbour and between versions of the same compiler. Just a couple of examples. 1) At() - hb_At() issue in Harbour. As a result now we have At() in xHarbour and in of