Hi All,
After a few days in SVN and actual usage (throwing out
every stuff related to old make systems), I have to say
I don't like the new extensions, so I'll revert them to
original state in the next few days, unless there is
some convincing input not to do so.
.hbl is too limiting. After
My two cents for convincing you
IMO is right having P for Project instead Parameter
sound very good Hbp for traditional project file
and hbl,(hbc,hbx) for Library and other Common eXternal parameter
I imvite other harobour use explain point of view
more point on view
more better harbour version
My two cents for convincing you
IMO is right having P for Project instead Parameter
sound very good Hbp for traditional project file
and hbl,(hbc,hbx) for Library and other Common eXternal parameter
I imvite other harobour use explain point of view
more point on view
more better harbour version
IMO is right having P for Project instead Parameter
sound very good Hbp for traditional project file
and hbl,(hbc,hbx) for Library and other Common eXternal parameter
.hbc doesn't tell much about the purpose (common
what?).
I do not know what common is, but it could be HarBour Config.
Good idea, thanks!
Brgds,
Viktor
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
dbto...@dbtopas.lt wrote:
IMO is right having P for Project instead Parameter
sound very good Hbp for traditional project file
and hbl,(hbc,hbx) for Library and other Common eXternal parameter
.hbc
I agree
I was thinking Common configuration to multiple file
2009/5/27 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas dbto...@dbtopas.lt:
IMO is right having P for Project instead Parameter
sound very good Hbp for traditional project file
and hbl,(hbc,hbx) for Library and other Common eXternal parameter
.hbc
Thanks for the idea to both of you.
Brgds,
Viktor
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Massimo Belgrano mbelgr...@deltain.it wrote:
I agree
I was thinking Common configuration to multiple file
2009/5/27 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas dbto...@dbtopas.lt:
IMO is right having P for Project instead
