Hi Viktor,
> No, it's the result of moving my "unofficial" beta3
> packages from my web host to sf.net. This directed the traffic
> to sf.net, which is calculated to the rank by sf.net engine.
Maybe a beta4, with the new settings/findings with Qt4.6 is useful for the
community, how do you think
Viktor i Higly apreciate your work
sorry if same of my post will sound a nonsense to you
You must undestrand the barrier:
the language (my wrost english)
my little knowledge (of all harbour internal)
My fault memory (i not rember also what i know)
So now i can understand that 2 _full_ days of work
> Compliment to developer team!
> Harbour now is solid,reliable and go to have a better ranking
>
> What is appended for having better result from 14 to 15 november
> 2009-11-141,134
> 2009-11-15 171
> In a first time i have think to a hbide effect , due large conses of xmate
> but the c
Compliment to developer team!
Harbour now is solid,reliable and go to have a better ranking
What is appended for having better result from 14 to 15 november
2009-11-141,134
2009-11-15 171
In a first time i have think to a hbide effect , due large conses of xmate
but the cause seem:
Offic
See:
http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/rank_history.php?group_id=681&ugn=harbour-project
Brgds,
Viktor
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
