Hi Antonio,
IMO no, because usrrdd is not a standalone RDD,
but rather the infrastructure (API) for standalone
RDDs. IOW if you link in usrrdd to an app, you
won't get a ready-to-use RDD.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.06.30., at 7:41, Antonio Linares wrote:
If all Harbour RDDs are named now rdd... (r
If all Harbour RDDs are named now rdd... (rddntx.lib, rddcdx.lib,
rddfpt.lib, rddado.lib), shouldn't we use rddusr.lib instead of
current hbusrrdd.lib name ?
Thanks,
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/ma
R: Re: [Harbour] Group opinion on RC2 from RC1 or main
branch?
No. Only after release 1.0.
Notice however, that this could technically be
implemented completely outside the core, say,
for example in GTWVG. Later on we can move some
logic to core, when we see and agree on what we
really need an
Very thank for all info
Confirmed the rc2 days?
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Inviato: sabato 28 giugno 2008 23.19
A: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Oggetto: Re: R: Re: [Harbour] Group opinion on RC2 from RC1 or main branch?
No. Only after r
No. Only after release 1.0.
Notice however, that this could technically be
implemented completely outside the core, say,
for example in GTWVG. Later on we can move some
logic to core, when we see and agree on what we
really need and want.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.06.28., at 21:39, Massimo Belgrano
What about pritpal modification for multiple windows gt?
Can be part of rc2
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Inviato: mercoledì 25 giugno 2008 7.51
A: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Oggetto: Re: [Harbour] Group opinion on RC2 from RC1 or main branch?
H
