On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
Hi
> > It may change in different HVM version so no one should create code
> > which depends on current behavior anyhow if you are interested what
> > happens now then return value is overwritten by last return value in
> > executed code (depending on cont
Hi
Przemysław Czerpak wrote:
>
> It may change in different HVM version so no one should create code
> which depends on current behavior anyhow if you are interested what
> happens now then return value is overwritten by last return value in
> executed code (depending on context it may cause so
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
Hi,
> > I've just checked hbqt_slots.cpp and there are _many_
> > hb_vmRequestReenter() calls without hb_vmRequestRestore()
> > pairs.
> > I don't know the consequences, but it doesn't seem right.
> Matched.
> I also do not know its implications, Przemek
Hi
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
> I've just checked hbqt_slots.cpp and there are _many_
> hb_vmRequestReenter() calls without hb_vmRequestRestore()
> pairs.
>
> I don't know the consequences, but it doesn't seem right.
>
Matched.
I also do not know its implications, Przemek ?
Regards
Pritpal B
