Re: [Hardhats-members] Trouble setting up FDA

Okay, I'll take a closer look at this tomorrow. But one possible solution is to make a call to FIND^DIC first, then build an FDA array that uses either "+1" or the actual IEN at the top level. Are you actually using XML, or were you just using it here to clarify your intent? I ask because a teccch

Re: [Hardhats-members] Nov 17th interview

Could you please provide the URL for this so it is adequately referencedthanks!!! Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here it is Nancy. Tom Henderson FOIA version of Vista remains available despite recent changes /*By Joseph Conn / *November 17, 2004/ // Despi

Re: [Hardhats-members] Trouble setting up FDA

George, My intent is to allow a user's script to look something like this: DOE,JOHN JD TMGDIVISION YES UCI NO FAMILY PRACTICE The default is that the .01 field is used for searching for old records. (If the user wants to use more

[Hardhats-members] Nov 17th interview

Here it is Nancy.   Tom Henderson       FOIA version of Vista remains available despite recent changes By Joseph Conn / November 17, 2004    Despite plans to overhaul its Vista clinical system, the Veterans Health Administration will continue to offer copies of its multimillion-dollar software

Re: [Hardhats-members] Trouble setting up FDA

I don't think you want a question mark at the second level. Is your intended logic 1) Search for entries matching a given value 2) If you find a match, use that record 3) Otherwise, create a new one 4a) Then, add subentries if no EXISTING subentries match in records that already exist or 4b)

Re: [Hardhats-members] Trouble setting up FDA

I am not sure I can make out what your FDA array is looking like. Can you show the setup and call? Kevin Toppenberg wrote: Hey all. I am having trouble setting up FDA properly. Here is the data I want to put into the database: FDA(*) }>200= '' | }>?+1,= '' | | }>.01= DOE,KOHN | | }>1= JD | | }>

Re: [Hardhats-members] Trouble setting up FDA

Greg, Thanks for your feedback. It is hard for me to follow the code below, especially since I don't know the format of your inputs. So should I format FDA like this? FDA(200,"?+1,",.01)= DOE,JOHN FDA(200,"?+1,",1)= JD FDA(200,"?+1,",7)= NO FDA(200,"?+1,",7.2)= YES FDA(200,"?+1,",11.2)= TODAY F

[Hardhats-members] News story about GPL 3

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1730102,00.asp -- Nancy Anthracite --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hy

RE: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems

Thanks Skip, I also have gotten this working. For complex reasons, my install scripter was adding the record, and then trying to overwrite it a second time. It working now. I think you cheated a bit below, though. You sent the error messages to ZZERR, and then showed that there were no errors

Re: [Hardhats-members] Trouble setting up FDA

Greg, I'm not sure you would be able to make sense of just a snipet of the code. Let me reformat the FDA below. The way I was showing it below is supposed to be an ASCII representation of a data tree. FDA(200,"?+1,",.01)= DOE,JOHN FDA(200,"?+1,",1)= JD FDA(200,"?+1,",7)= NO FDA(200,"?+1,",7.2)=

[Hardhats-members] Modern Physician

Has everyone seen this.  The following from Modern Physician Nov. 22     Vendors form group to market VA's Vista system By Joseph Conn / November 22, 2004   Eight technology firms, including Hewlett-Packard Co. and Perot Systems Corp., have formed the Vista Software Alliance, a trade associati

[Hardhats-members] Trouble setting up FDA

Hey all. I am having trouble setting up FDA properly. Here is the data I want to put into the database: FDA(*) }>200= '' | }>?+1,= '' | | }>.01= DOE,KOHN | | }>1= JD | | }>7= NO | | }>7.2= YES | | }>11.2= TODAY | | }>20= UCI | | }>29= FAMILY PRACTICE }>200.02= '' | }>?+1,= '' | | }>

Re: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems

I thought the issue was the use of FILE^DIE to update a field that is a pointer to a file.  As you say, FIND^DIC has a flag for this behavior.  I wonder if FILE^DIE uses FIND^DIC to find the pointed to record and uses this flag in the process. maybe Skip knows and could tell us. Greg Woodh

RE: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems

The following is an example of adding the XUPROG key for a specific user, that is the IEN/DUZ(0) is known: OUTPUT FROM WHAT FILE: NEW PERSON// Select NEW PERSON NAME:TESTER,CHESTER D CCT DEC 01, 2003 ANOTHER ONE: STANDARD CAPTIONED OUTPUT? Yes// (Yes) Include COMPUTED fields:

[Hardhats-members] "source code disclosure" and Hui FSL example

I have moved this post to a new thread name to emphasize a question I have that is highlighted by the example of Hui FSL. I am hoping that Steven Tomlinson will comment (availing himself of disclaimer not representing Hui). If Hui FSL is not a comprehensive model for WorldVista needs, it serve

Re: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems

There's actually a flag to control this behavior. If you look at the documentation for FIND^DIC, you'll find the following description for the "O" (for "Only") flag: Only find exact matches if possible. The Finder first searches for exact matches on the requested Index(es); if any are found, it re

Re: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems

I just did some testing and Kevin is right.  I was surprised to see that if a field is a pointer and you 'file' a value for field that makes an exact name match in the pointed to file, it doesn't bring up the partials that would normally match it.  It goes with the exact match. But, further tes

Re: [Hardhats-members] Small office use of Vista

John, I am a physician in a 15 doctor group. We are getting ready to install VistA in our practice. We primarily use an EMR as an electronic backup of printed progress notes in the paper chart. Initially we will not have lab interface etc. I have been learning how to do the install myself, but

Re: [Hardhats-members] More DINUM problems

Nancy, Thanks for your post. I don't think that the FILE^DIE and UPDATER^DIE will balk as partial matches. In other words, if I tell it XUPROG, it does not get confused with XUPROGMODE. I know that interactive fileman will ask about this, but I have already used it for looking up menu options,