The lack of transaction support is somewhat disconcerting. If the globals ended up in an inconsistent state, how would I know? Also, how would I know when the problem first began?
Thanks,
Marc
You have journaling, you have backup, and you have the track record of the VA
with the incredibly heavy use of this system by huge numbers of institutions,
and you have an open code and people who are being honest about what needs
improvement. That should give you considerable comfort.
On
They are indeed Cache specific. I missed deleting those when I removed the
Cache specific stuff for the generic set of globals.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy
Anthracite
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 10:04 AM
To:
Comments below.
-- Bhaskar
On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 17:44 -0600, Nancy Anthracite wrote:
I beg to differ because when we were working on the project with the
Codeweavers, on my system the globals would be adversely affected and
new
connections could not be made after trying to connect with
Cameron --
Do they cause any harm? Should I remove them and re-release FOIA VistA
SemiVivA and VivitA 20060113? Thank you very much.
-- Bhaskar
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 10:40 -0600, Cameron Schlehuber wrote:
They are indeed Cache specific. I missed deleting those when I
removed the
Cache
--- Marc Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The lack of transaction support is somewhat disconcerting. If the
globals
ended up in an inconsistent state, how would I know? Also, how would
I know
when the problem first began?
Thanks,
Marc
I share your concern. The lack of transaction
--- Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only know that if I changed the mumps.dat out for a backup copy
that it
worked again.
On Monday 30 January 2006 11:49, Bhaskar, KS wrote:
Comments below.
-- Bhaskar
The globals *could* have been corrupted, but there are also other
No harm if they stay, other than causing questions about what they are :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bhaskar,
KS
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 10:00 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members]
So is the version of CPRS included with SemiViva the 'official' and safe version assuming it is run on a real Windows client?
Thanks,
Marc
You can download it if it isn't from the VA ftp site. It is in OR_30_235.zip
in the Order Entry-Results Reporting - OR directory under
ftp.va.gov/vista/Software/Packages
On Monday 30 January 2006 20:28, Marc Krawitz wrote:
So is the version of CPRS included with SemiViva the 'official' and
Yes, it's the same executable. The difference is in how you run it.
-- Bhaskar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Marc Krawitz
Sent: Mon 1/30/2006 8:28 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Subject:Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: FOIA
11 matches
Mail list logo
