On 3/15/06, Ruben Safir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They sometimes change the drug and keep the drug code.
I think they did that with Tricor if I recall.
Ruben
So when looking for matches between FDA data and VistA data, a
matching NDC is NOT sufficient to say that the drugs are the same
On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Dan wrote:
I'm not sure if this is proper error trap handling with RPC. Is as
if there's a problem with XTER. on your system. $ZE should be set
to the error info. Instead it is set to the line of code that
would set $ZE to the error info.
How long has
Nancy,
Your direction fixed my problem.
Thanks to all of you for your prompt support.
Well, it appears to be no null device, which probably means you need
tochange
$I to //./nul as follows:
D Q^DI
VA FileMan 22.0
Select OPTION: 1 ENTER OR EDIT FILE ENTRIES
INPUT TO WHAT FILE:
Is there any timeframe to update VistA with ICD 10 codes?
Thanks,
Marc
None that Im aware of.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Krawitz
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:06
PM
To:
hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Hardhats-members] icd 10
coding
Is there any timeframe to update
I don't think ICD 10 is being used in practice, is it?
Kevin
On 3/17/06, Cameron Schlehuber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None that I'm aware of.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marc Krawitz
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:06 PM
From today's HITS newsletter... (
http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article.cms?articleId=39097 )
Much of the discussion centered on H.R. 4157, federal legislation which
includes a requirement for the healthcare industry to switch from its
current billing code system, known as ICD-9, to a more
On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Marc Krawitz wrote:
Is there any timeframe to update VistA with ICD 10 codes?
Thanks,
Marc
Is there anything to stop members of the open source community from
doing it themselves?
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A perfectly rational dog placed
I am sure if the switch is made, the VA will make it, too, because they
collect from insurance companies. However, considering what happened with
HIPAA, if folks aren't lining up begging for this, 2009 may be a rather soft
target.
In addition, with the VA budget cuts, somehow I don't think
The lack of a burning desire to have it and no place to use it if you did have
it might have something to do with a lack of interest in doing it.
On Friday 17 March 2006 19:41, Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Marc Krawitz wrote:
Is there any timeframe to update VistA with
On Mar 17, 2006, at 6:09 PM, Nancy Anthracite wrote:
it might have something to do with a lack of interest in doing it.
That could do it.
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Design quality doesn't ensure success, but design failure can ensure
failure.
--Kent Beck
The whole concept of rewriting CPRS in Java gives us the opportunity to
look at the notion of a persistence layer versus a true object store.
So far what we've seen are various implementations of persistence
layers, such as ESI Objects and Cache. Good persistence layers are
obviously key
I have a correction to my post:
It is interesting to note that since Caché provides a JDBC driver
for it's data store, it is possible to use jpox to persist Java objects
*in MUMPS through JDBC* as opposed to using Caché Objects directly.
Richard
Richard Schilling wrote:
The whole
On Mar 17, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Richard Schilling wrote:
The whole concept of rewriting CPRS in Java gives us the
opportunity to look at the notion of a persistence layer versus a
true object store.
It might be a good idea to start out by defining what you mean by a
true object store. I
On Mar 17, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Richard Schilling wrote:
The whole concept of rewriting CPRS in Java gives us the
opportunity to look at the notion of a persistence layer versus a
true object store.
In your original post, you focused primarily on object storage and
access. Those are
I just noticed there is a new FOIA posted on ftp.va.gov/vista .
Cameron, it is hard to keep up with you!
--
Nancy Anthracite
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web
Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
()
It might be a good idea to start out by defining what you mean by a
true object store. I doubt seriously that we're all on the same page here.
Right ... good call. By true object store I mean a data store that is
capable of storing a) entire objects
Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
In your original post, you focused primarily on object storage and
access. Those are important, of course, but we can hardly ignore the
question of how that database should be queried: What is the most
natural way to refer to objects? If we have OIDs we're in
On Mar 17, 2006, at 7:50 PM, Richard Schilling wrote:
Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
In your original post, you focused primarily on object storage
and access. Those are important, of course, but we can hardly
ignore the question of how that database should be queried: What
is the most
I had understood that the proposed ICD 10-CM, like the current ICD 9-CM, is
for diagnoses of visits (clinical modification), but that the current ICD
10, like the old ICD 9, are mortality codes. Best I understand, while there
is a June 2003 draft of ICD 10-CM, there is no official schedule for
Only current use of ICD-10 I've heard has been coding causes of death and
significant conditions on death certificates. Its use varies from state to
state.
---
Baseball is the only major sport that appears backwards in a mirror.
21 matches
Mail list logo
